was a sacerdotal or priestly garment.  First, it occupies a prominent position in the narrative; second, it excited the enmity of Joseph’s brethren; and third, they dipped it in blood when they sold their younger brother.’  I could have proved it as logically to be Stuart tartan, and, at the same time, the original of the song ‘Not for Joe,’ because he lost it before he became steward to Pharaoh.  Bah! that’s what makes people sick of going to church.  I’ve pretty nigh quit it.”

The pedestrians trudged on for a time silently, the detective, doubtless, revolving schemes in his brain, the dominie inwardly sighing over his companion’s captious criticism, to which he could not well reply, and over the absence of his legal friend, whose warm Irish heart would have responded sympathetically to the inspiration of the Sabbath morning walk.  At last, Mr. Nash resumed the conversation, saying:—­

“I’m afraid, Mr. Wilkinson, that you think me a pretty hard-hearted, worldly man, and, perhaps, that my calling makes me so.”

“I have no right to judge you, Mr. Nash,” answered the schoolmaster; “but I should think that the work of hunting down law-breakers would have the effect of deadening one’s sensibilities.”

“It shouldn’t, any more than the work of a clergyman, a doctor, a teacher, or a lawyer.  We all, if we are honest, want to benefit society by correcting evils.  I see a lot of the dark side of human nature, but a little of the bright too, for, thank Heaven, there is no man so bad as not to have some little good in him.  There’s that Toner, once a fine young fellow; I hate to see him going to the dogs, wasting his property, breaking his old mother’s heart.  I’d rather save that man any day than gaol him.”

“Give me your hand, sir,” said the dominie, heartily, transferring his staff to his left, and offering the right; “I honour you for the saying, and wish there were more officers of the law like you.”

“Oh, as for that matter,” replied the detective, “I and my colleagues have tried to save many a young fellow, but then—­”

“What is the obstacle?”

“The obstacle is that there are men who simply won’t be saved.”

“Oh, I suppose that is true theologically as well as legally.”

“Of course; if the law don’t want to have a lot of criminals to hunt out and shut up and punish, it stands to reason that the Source of all law doesn’t.  But, for the good of society and the world, these criminals have to be separated from them, and their bad work stopped.  To say that the law hates them, and takes vengeance on them like a Corsican, is utterly to misunderstand the nature of law.  Yet, that is what nine-tenths of the parsons teach.”

“That is very unfortunate.”

“Unfortunate? it’s diabolical.  If I were to go into a good man’s house, and present his children with a hideous caricature of their father, so as to terrify some and drive others clean away from him, wouldn’t I deserve to be kicked out?  I should think so!  Now, I say every good thing in man must be found a million times better in man’s Maker.  If the foundation principle of human law is benevolence to society, the foundation principle of divine law must be something higher and better, not revenge.  But you know these things better than I do.”