As not many contend that Latin and Greek make an education in themselves, we may not improperly call to mind what other things it has been found possible to include with them in the scope of the Arts’ Degree.  The Scotch Universities were always distinguished from the English in the breadth of their requirements:  they have comprised, for many ages, three other subjects; mathematics, natural philosophy, and mental philosophy (including logic and ethics).  In exceptional instances, another science is added; in one case, natural history, in another, chemistry.  According to the notions of scientific order and completeness in the present day, a full course of the primary sciences would comprise mathematics, natural philosophy, chemistry, physiology or biology, and mental philosophy.  The natural history branches are not looked upon as primary sciences; they give no laws, but repeat the laws of the primary sciences while classifying the kingdoms of Nature. (See paragraph that begins with:  In the classification of the sciences ...).

In John Stuart Mill’s celebrated Address at St. Andrews, he stood up for the continuance of the Classics in all their integrity, and suddenly became a great authority with numbers of persons who probably had never treated him as an authority before.  But his advocacy of the classics was coupled with an equally strenuous advocacy for the extension of the scientific course to the full circle of the primary sciences; that is to say, he urged the addition of chemistry and physiology to the received sciences.  Those that have so industriously brandished his authority for retaining classics, are discreetly silent upon this other recommendation.  He was too little conversant with the working of Universities to be aware that the addition of two sciences to the existing course was impracticable; and he was never asked which alternative he would prefer.  I am inclined to believe that he would have sacrificed the classics to scientific completeness; he would have been satisfied with the quantum of these already gained at school.  But while we have no positive assurance on this point, I consider that his opinion should be wholly discounted as not bearing on the actual case.

[UNIVERSITY OF LONDON CURRICULUM.]

The founders of the University of London attempted to realise Mill’s conception to the full.  They retained Classics; they added English and a modern language, and completed the course of the primary sciences by including both Chemistry and Physiology.  This was a noble experiment, and we can now report on its success.  The classical languages, English and French or German, mathematics and natural philosophy, and (after a time) logic and moral philosophy, were all kept at a good standard; thus exceeding the requirements of the Scotch Universities at the time by English and a modern language.  The amount of attainment in chemistry was very small, and was disposed of in the Matriculation examination.  Physiology was