Burke considered manners of more importance than laws.  Sidney Smith described manners as the shadows of virtues.  Dean Swift defined manners as the art of putting at ease the people with whom we converse.  Chesterfield said manners should adorn knowledge in order to smooth its way through the world.  Emerson spoke of manners as composed of petty sacrifices.

We all recognize that a winning manner is made up of seemingly insignificant courtesies, and of constant little attentions.  A person of charming manner is usually free from resentments, inquisitiveness, and moods.

Personality plays a large part in interesting conversation.  Precisely the same phraseology expressed by two different persons may make two wholly different impressions, and all because of the difference in the personalities of the speakers.

The daily mental life of a man indelibly impresses itself upon his face, where it can be unmistakably read by others.  What a person is, innately and habitually, unconsciously discloses itself in voice, manner, and bearing.  The world ultimately appraises a man at his true value.

The best type of talker is slow to express positive opinions, is sparing in criticism, and studiously avoids a tone or word of finality.  It has been well said that “A talker who monopolizes the conversation is by common consent insufferable, and a man who regulates his choice of topics by reference to what interests not his hearers but himself has yet to learn the alphabet of the art.  Conversation is like lawn-tennis, and requires alacrity in return at least as much as vigor in service.  A happy phrase, an unexpected collocation of words, a habitual precision in the choice of terms, are rare and shining ornaments of conversation, but they do not for an instant supply the place of lively and interesting matter, and an excessive care for them is apt to tell unfavorably on the substance of discourse.”

When Lord Beaconsfield was talking his way into social fame, someone said of him, “I might as well attempt to gather up the foam of the sea as to convey an idea of the extraordinary language in which he clothed his description.  There were at least five words in every sentence that must have been very much astonished at the use they were put to, and yet no others apparently could so well have expressed his idea.  He talked like a racehorse approaching the winning-post—­every muscle in action, and the utmost energy of expression flung out into every burst.”

We are told that Matthew Arnold combined all the characteristics of good conversation—­politeness, vivacity, sympathy, interestedness, geniality, a happy choice of words, and a never-failing humor.  When he was once asked what was his favorite topic for conversation, he instantly answered, “That in which my companion is most interested.”

Courtesy, it will be noted, is the fundamental basis of good conversation.  We must show habitual consideration and kindliness towards others if we would attract them to us.  Bluntness of manner is no longer excused on the ground that the speaker is sincere and outspoken.  We expect and demand that our companion in conversation should observe the recognized courtesies of speech.