Restatement
of proposition as to the amount of the product of
labour.
The
product of ability only partially described by assimilating
it
to rent.
Ability
produces everything which would not be produced if
its
operation
were hampered or suspended.
Increased
reward of labour in Great Britain since the year 1800.
The
reward now received by labour far in excess of what
labour
itself
produces.
In
capitalistic countries generally labour gets, not less,
but
far
more than its due, if its due is to be measured by
its own
products.
It
is necessary to remember this; but its due is not to
be
measured
exclusively by its own products.
As will be seen in the concluding chapter.
CHAPTER XIII
Interestand abstract justice
The
proposal to confiscate interest for the public benefit,
on
the
ground that it is income unconnected with any corresponding
effort.
Is
the proposal practicable? Is it defensible on
grounds of
abstract
justice?
The
abstract moral argument plays a large part in the
discussion.
It
assumes that a man has a moral right to what he produces,
interest
being here contrasted with this, as a something which
he
does not produce.
Defects
of this argument. It ignores the element of time.
Some
forms
of effort are productive long after the effort itself
has
ceased.
For
examples, royalties on an acted play. Such royalties
herein
typical
of interest generally.
Industrial
interest as a product of the forces of organic
nature.
Henry George’s defence of interest as having
this
origin.
His
argument true, but imperfect. His superficial
criticism of
Bastiat.
Nature
works through machine-capital just as truly as it does
in
agriculture.
Machines
are natural forces captured by men of genius, and set
to
work for the benefit of human beings.
Interest
on machine-capital is part of an extra product which
nature
is made to yield by those men who are exceptionally
capable
of controlling her.
By
capturing natural forces, one man of genius may add
more to
the
wealth of the world in a year than an ordinary man
could add
to
it in a hundred lifetimes.
The
claim of any such man on the products of his genius
is
limited
by a variety of circumstances; but, as a mere matter
of
abstract
justice, the whole of it belongs to him.