For, notwithstanding certain advantages,[2] feudalism had this great evil:  that the chief nobles often became in time more powerful than the King.  This danger now menaced England.  For convenience Canute the Dane had divided the realm into four earldoms.  The holders of these vast estates had grown so mighty that they scorned royal authority.  Edward the Confessor did not dare resist them.  The ambition of each earl was to get the supreme mastery.  This threatened to bring on civil war, and to split the kingdom into fragments.  Fortunately for the welfare of the nation, William, Duke of Normandy, by his invasion and conquest of England, 1066, put an effectual stop to the selfish schemes of these four rival nobles.

[2] On the Advantages of Feudalism, see S87.

6.  William the Conqueror and his Work.

After William’s victory at Hastings and march on London (SS74, 107), the National Council chose him sovereign,—­they would not have dared to refuse,—­and he was crowned by the Archbishop of York in Westminster Abbey.  This coronation made him the legal successor of the line of English kings.  In form, therefore, there was no break in the order of government; for though William had forced himself upon the throne, he had done so according to law and custom, and not directly by the sword.

Great changed followed the conquest, but they were not violent.  The King abolished the four great earldoms (S64), and restored national unity.  He gradually dispossessed the chief English landholders of their lands, and bestowed them, under strict feudal laws, on his Norman followers.  He likewise gave all the highest positions in the Church to Norman bishops and abbots.  The National Council now changed its character.  It became simply a body of Norman barons, who were bound by feudal custom to meet with the King.  But they did not restrain his authority; for William would brook no interference with his will from any one, not even from the Pope himself (S118).

But though the Conqueror had a tyrant’s power, he rarely used it like a tyrant.  We have seen[1] that the great excellence of the early English government lay in the fact that the towns, hundreds, and shires were self-governing in all local matters; the drawback to this system was its lack of unity and of a strong central power that could make itself respected and obeyed.  William supplied this power,—­ without which there could be no true national strength,—­yet at the same time he was careful to encourage the local system of self-government.  He gave London a liberal charter to protect its rights and liberties (S107).  He began the organization of a royal court of justice; he checked the rapacious Norman barons in their efforts to get control of the people’s courts.

[1] See SS2, 3 of this Summary.

Furthermore, side by side with the feudal cavalry army, he maintained the old English county militia of foot soldiers, in which every freeman was bound to serve.  He used this militia, when necessary, to prevent the barons from getting the upper hand, and so destroying those liberties which were protected by the Crown as its own best safeguard against the plots of the nobles.