[1] This act virtually suspended the operation of the Corporation Act (S472) and the Test Act against dissenters so that they could obtain civil offices from which these two acts had excluded them.

In 1829 a still greater reform was carried.  For a long period the Catholic Association had been laboring to obtain the abolition of the laws which had been on the statute books for over a century and a half, by which Catholics were excluded from the right to sit in Parliament.  These laws, it will be remembered, were enacted at the time of the alleged Popish Plot, and in consequence of the perjured evidence given by Titus Oates (S478).[2] The King, and the Tory party marshaled by the Duke of Wellington, strenuously resisted the repeal of these statutes; but finally the Duke became convinced that further opposition was useless.  He therefore suddenly changed about and solely, as he declared, to avert civil war, took the lead in securing the success of a measure which he heartily hated.

[2] See Sidney Smith’s “Peter Plymley’s Letters.”

But at the same time that Catholics were admitted to both Houses of Parliament, an act was passed raising the property qualification of a very large class of small Irish landholders from 2 pounds to 10 pounds.  This measure deprived many thousands of their right to vote.  The law was enacted on the pretext that the small Irish landholders would be influenced by their landlord or their priest.

Under the new order of things, Daniel O’Connell, an Irish gentleman of an old and honorable family, and a man of distinguished ability, came forward as leader of the Catholics.  After much difficulty he succeeded in taking his seat in the House of Commons (1829).  He henceforth devoted himself, though without avail, to the repeal of the act uniting Ireland with England (S562), and to the restoration of an independent Irish Parliament.

574.  The New Police (1829).

Although London had now a population of a million and a half, it still had no effective police.  The guardians of the peace at that date were infirm old men, who spent their time dozing in sentry boxes, and had neither the strength nor energy to be of service in any emergency.  The young fellows of fashion considered these venerable constables as legitimate game.  They often amused themselves by upsetting the sentry boxes with their occupants, leaving the latter helpless in the street, kicking and struggling like turtles turned on their backs, and as powerless to get on their feet again.

During the last year of the reign Sir Robert Peel got a bill passed (1829) which oganized a new and thoroughly efficient police force, properly equipped and uniformed.  Great was the outcry against this innovation, and the “men in blue” were hooted at, not only by London “roughs,” but by respectable citizens, as “Bobbies” or “Peelers,” in derisive allusion to their founder.  But the “Bobbies,” who carry no visible club, were not to be jeered out of existence.  They did their duty like men, and have continued to do it in a way which long since gained for them the good will of all who care for the preservation of law and order.