Considering wide Trade Union assistance to the railway workers to be one of the principal tasks of the Party, and as the only condition under which transport can be raised to its height, the Congress at the same time recognizes the inflexible necessity of employing exclusive and extraordinary measures (martial law, and so forth).  Such necessity is the result of the terrible collapse of the transport and the railroad system and is to introduce measures which cannot be delayed and which are to obviate the complete paralysis of the railway system and, together with this, the ruin of the Soviet Republic.

The general attitude to the militarization of labour is stated in the Resolution with which this section of the Proceedings begins: 

The ninth Congress approves of the decision of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party on the mobilization of the industrial proletariat, compulsory labour service, militarization of production and the application of military detachments to economic needs.

In connection with the above, the Congress decrees that the Party organization should in every way assist the Trade Unions and the Labour Sections in registering all skilled workers with a view of employing them in the various branches of production with the same consistency and strictness as was done, and is being carried out at the present time, in relation to the commanding staff for army needs.

Every skilled worker is to return to his particular trade Exceptions, i.e. the retention of the skilled worker in any other branch of Soviet service, is allowed only with the sanction of the corresponding central and local authorities.

It is, of course, evident that in these measures the Bolsheviks have been compelled to travel a long way from the ideals which originally inspired the revolution.  But the situation is so desperate that they could not be blamed if their measures were successful.  In a shipwreck all hands must turn to, and it would be ridiculous to prate of individual liberty.  The most distressing feature of the situation is that these stern laws seem to have produced so little effect.  Perhaps in the course of years Russia might become self-supporting without help from the outside world, but the suffering meantime would be terrible.  The early hopes of the revolution would fade more and more.  Every failure of industry, every tyrannous regulation brought about by the desperate situation, is used by the Entente as a justification of its policy.  If a man is deprived of food and drink, he will grow weak, lose his reason, and finally die.  This is not usually considered a good reason for inflicting death by starvation.  But where nations are concerned, the weakness and struggles are regarded as morally culpable, and are held to justify further punishment.  So at least it has been in the case of Russia.  Nothing produced a doubt in our governing minds as to the rightness of our policy except the strength of the Red Army and the fear of revolution in Asia.  Is it surprising that professions of humanitarian feeling on the part of English people are somewhat coldly received in Soviet Russia?