how much of the noise this caused.  If a jet airplane with a silent engine could be built, how much noise would it make?  How far could it be heard?  To get the answer I contacted National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Laboratory at Langley AFB, a government agency which specializes in aeronautical research.  They didn’t know.  Neither they nor anybody else had ever done any research on this question.  Their opinion was that such an aircraft could not be heard 5,000 or 10,000 feet away.  Aerodynamicists at Wright Field’s Aircraft Laboratory agreed.

I called the Army’s Ballistic Research Laboratories at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, to find out why artillery shells whine.  These people develop and test all kinds of shells so they would have an answer if anybody did.  They said that the majority of the whine of an artillery shell is probably caused by the flat back end of the shell.  If a perfectly streamlined shell could be used it would not have any perceivable whine.

What I found out, or didn’t find out, about the sound of an object moving at several times the speed of sound was typical of nearly every question that came up regarding UFO’s.  We were working in a field where there were no definite answers to questions.  In some instances we were getting into fields far advanced above the then present levels of research.  In other instances we were getting into fields where no research had been done at all.  It made the problem of UFO analysis one of getting opinions.  All we could do was hope the opinions we were getting were the best.

My attempts to reach a definite conclusion as to what the professors had seen met another blank wall.  I had no more success than I’d had trying to reach a conclusion on the authenticity of the photographs.

A thorough analysis of the reports of the flying wings seen by the retired rancher’s wife in Lubbock and the AEC employee and his wife in Albuquerque was made.  The story from the two ladies who saw the aluminum-colored pear-shaped object hovering near the road near Matador, Texas, was studied, checked, and rechecked.  Another blank wall on all three of these sightings.

By the time I got around to working on the report from the radar station in Washington State, the data of the weather conditions that existed on the night of the sighting had arrived.  I turned the incident folder over to the electronics specialists at ATIC.  They made the analysis and determined that the targets were caused by weather, although it was a borderline case.  They further surmised that since the targets had been picked up on two radars, if I checked I’d find out that the two targets looked different on the two radarscopes.  This is a characteristic of a weather target picked up on radars operating on different frequencies.  I did check.  I called the radar station and talked to the captain who was in charge of the crew the night the target had been picked up.