The change of government met with no resistance in Egypt, where the majority of the emirs had long been dependent on Beybars and Sellar.  In Syria, on the other hand, the emirs acting as governors refused to acknowledge Beybars, partly from devotion to Nasir’s race, and partly because the choice had been made without their consent.  Only Akush, Governor of Damascus, who was an old friend of Beybars, and like him a Circassian, took the oath of allegiance.  The governors of Aleppo, Hamah, and Tripoli, together with the governors of Safed and Jerusalem, called upon Nasir to join them, and, with the help of his other followers, to reconquer Egypt.  The cunning sultan, who saw that the time for open resistance had not yet arrived, since Egypt was as yet too unanimous, and Damascus also had joined the enemy, advised them to deceive Beybars and to take the oath of allegiance, which they could break later, as having been obtained by force.  He himself feigned to submit to the new government, and even had the prayers carried on from the chancel in Beybars’ name.  Beybars was deceived, although he knew with certainty that Nasir carried on a lively intercourse with the discontented emirs.  He relied chiefly on Akush, who kept a strict watch over Nasir’s movements.  The spies of Akush, however, were open to corruption, and they failed later to take steps to render Nasir harmless at the right moment.  Beybars believed Nasir to be still in Kerak, when he was well on the way to Damascus; and when he finally received news of this, the rebellion had already gone so far that some of the troops who had been sent out against the sultan had already deserted to his side.  The only possible way of allaying the storm was for Beybars to put himself at the head of his troops, and, joining forces with Akush, to offer battle to Nasir.  The necessary courage and resolution failed him.  Instead of having recourse to the sword, he applied to the caliph, who declared Nasir an exile, and summoned all believers to listen to the Sultan Beybars—­whom he had consecrated—­and to take part in the war against the rebel, Nasir.  But the summons of the caliph, which was read in all the chancels, had not the slightest effect.  The belief in the caliph had long disappeared, except in so far as he was considered a tool of the sultan on whom he depended.  Even Beybars’ party mocked the caliph’s declaration, and wherever it was read manifestations were made in favour of the exile.  Beybars, also, was now deserted by Sellar, and he at length was obliged to resign.  Beybars was then seized and throttled by Nasir, and Sellar was starved to death.