and Sparta, recalled by these reverses to a realisation
of her position, wisely abandoned her inclination
for distant enterprises. Asia Minor was reconquered,
and Persia passed from the position of a national enemy
to that of the friend and arbiter of Greece; but she
did so by force of circumstances only, and not from
having merited in any way the supremacy she attained.
Her military energy, indeed, was far from being exhausted;
but poor Artaxerxes, bewildered by the rivalries between
his mother and his wives, did not know how to make
the most of the immense resources still at his disposal,
and he met with repeated checks as soon as he came
face to face with a nation and leaders who refused
to stoop to treachery. He had no sooner recovered
possession of the AEgean littoral than Egypt was snatched
from his grasp by a new Pharaoh who had arisen in
the Nile valley. The peace had not been seriously
disturbed in Egypt during the forty years which had
elapsed since the defeat of Inarus. Satrap had
peaceably succeeded satrap in the fortress of Memphis;
the exhaustion of Libya had pre-vented any movement
on the part of Thannyras; the aged Amyrtaeus had passed
from the scene, and his son, Pausiris, bent his neck
submissively to the Persian yoke. More than once,
however, unexpected outbursts had shown that the fires
of rebellion were still smouldering. A Psammetichus,
who reigned about 445 B.C. in a corner of the Delta,
had dared to send corn and presents to the Athenians,
then at war with Artaxerxes I., and the second year
of Darius II. had been troubled by a sanguinary sedition,
which, however, was easily suppressed by the governor
then in power; finally, about 410 B.C., a king of
Egypt had, not without some show of evidence, laid
himself open to the charge of sending a piratical expedition
into Phoenician waters, an Arab king having contributed
to the enterprise.*
* The revolt mentioned
by Ctesias has nothing to do with the
insurrection of the
satrap of Egypt which is here referred
to, the date of which
is furnished by the Syncellus.
It was easy to see, moreover, from periodical revolts—such
as that of Megabyzos in Syria, those of Artyphios
and Arsites, of Pissuthnes and Amorges in Asia Minor—with
what impunity the wrath of the great king could be
defied: it was not to be wondered at, therefore,
that, about 405 B.C., an enemy should appear in the
heart of the Delta in the person of a grandson and
namesake of Amyrtaeus. He did not at first rouse
the whole country to revolt, for Egyptian troops were
still numbered in the army of Artaxerxes at the battle
of Cunaxa in 401 B.C.; but he succeeded in establishing
a regular native government, and struggled so resolutely
against the foreign domination that the historians
of the sacred colleges inscribed his name on the list
of the Pharaohs. He is there made to represent
a whole dynasty, the XXVIIIth which lasted six years,
coincident with the six years of his reign. It