History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 8 (of 12) eBook

Gaston Maspero
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 410 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 8 (of 12).

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 8 (of 12) eBook

Gaston Maspero
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 410 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 8 (of 12).
her powers.  The partisans of Khumban-igash were largely responsible for bringing about the catastrophe in which Tiumman had perished, and those who sided with Tammaritu had not feared to provoke a revolt at the moment when Khumban-igash was occupied in Chaldaea; Indabigash in his turn had risen in rebellion in the rear of Tammaritu, and his intervention had enabled the Assyrians to deal their final blow at Shamash-shumukin.  The one idea of the non-reigning members of the royal house was to depose the reigning sovereign, and they considered all means to this end as justifiable, whether assassination, revolt, desertion to the enemy, or defection on the very field of battle.  As soon as one of them had dethroned another, hatred of the foreigner again reigned supreme in his breast, and he donned his armour with a firm determination to bring the struggle to an end, but the course he had pursued towards his predecessor was now adopted by one of his relatives towards himself; the enemy meanwhile was still under arms, and each of these revolutions brought him a step nearer to the goal of his endeavours, the complete overthrow of the Elamite kingdom and its annexation to the empire of Nineveh.  Even before the struggle with Babylon was concluded, Assur-bani-pal had demanded of Indabigash the release of the Assyrians whom Nabo-bel-shumu had carried off in his train, besides the extradition of that personage himself.  Indabigash had no desire for war at this juncture, but hesitated to surrender the Kalda, who had always served him faithfully:  he entered into negotiations which were interminably prolonged, neither of the two parties being anxious to bring them to a close.  After the fall of Babylon, Assur-bani-pal, who was tenacious in his hatred, summoned the Elamite ambassadors, and sent them back to their master with a message conceived in the following menacing terms:  “If thou dost not surrender those men, I will go and destroy thy cities, and lead into captivity the inhabitants of Susa, Madaktu, and Khaidalu.  I will hurl thee from thy throne, and will set up another thereon:  as aforetime I destroyed Tiumman, so will I destroy thee.”  A detachment of troops was sent to enforce the message of defiance, but when the messengers had reached the frontier town of Deri, Indabigash was no longer there:  his nobles had assassinated him, and had elected Khumban-khaldash, the son of Atta-metush, king in his stead.  The opportunity was a favourable one to sow the seeds of division in the Elamite camp, before the usurper should have time to consolidate his power:  Assur-bani-pal therefore threw himself into the cause of Tammaritu, supporting him with an army to which many malcontents speedily rallied.  The Aramaeans and the cities of the marsh-lands on the littoral, Khilmu, Billate, Dummuku, Sulaa, Lakhiru, and Dibirina, submitted without a struggle, and the invaders met with no resistance till they reached Bit-Imbi.  This town had formerly been conquered by Sennacherib, but it had afterwards
Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 8 (of 12) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.