a detachment of picked troops, to avenge him.
The murderer threw down his arms almost without having
struck a blow, and Gurgum was thenceforward placed
under the direct rule of Nineveh. The affair
had not been brought to a close before an outbreak
took place in Southern Syria, which might have entailed
very serious consequences had it not been promptly
dealt with. Egypt, united from end to end under
the sceptre of Sabaco, jealously kept watch over the
political complications in Asia, and though perhaps
she was not sure enough of her own strength to interfere
openly before the death of Eusas, she had renewed
negotiations with the petty kingdoms of the Hebrews
and Philistines. Ashdod had for some time past
showed signs of discontent, and it had been found
necessary to replace their king, Azuri, who had refused
to pay tribute, by his brother Akhimiti; shortly after
this, however, the people had risen in rebellion:
they had massacred Akhimiti, whom they accused of
being a mere thrall of Assyria, and had placed on
the throne Yamani, a soldier of fortune, probably
an adventurer of Hellenic extraction.* The other Philistine
cities had immediately taken up arms; Edom and Moab
were influenced by the general movement, and Isaiah
was striving to avert any imprudent step on the part
of Judah. Sargon despatched the Tartan,** and
the rapidity with which that officer carried out the
campaign prevented the movement from spreading beyond
Philistia. He devastated Ashdod, and its vassal,
Gath, carried off their gods and their inhabitants,
and peopled the cities afresh with prisoners from
Asia Minor, Urartu, and Media. Yamani attempted
to escape into Egypt, but the chief of Milukhkha intercepted
him on his way, and handed him over in chains to the
conqueror.***
* This prince’s name, usually written Yamani, is also written Yatnani in the Annals, and this variation, which is found again in the name of the island of Cyprus and the Cypriotes, gives us grounds for believing that the Assyrian scribe took the race-name of the prince for a proper name: the new king of Ashdod would have been a Yamani, a Greek of Cyprus.
** The Assyrian narratives, as usual, give the honour of conducting the campaign to the king. Isaiah (xx. 1) distinctly says that Sargon sent the Tartan to quell the revolt of Ashdod.
*** The Annals state that Yamani was made prisoner and taken to Assyria. The Fastes, more accurate on this point, state that he escaped to Muzri, and that he was given up by the King of Milukhkha. The Muzri mentioned in this passage very probably here means Egypt.
The latter took care not to call either Moab, Edom, or Judah to account for the part they had taken in the movement, perhaps because they were not mentioned in his instructions, or because he preferred not to furnish them, by an untimely interference, with a pretext for calling in the help of Egypt. The year was