History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12) eBook

Gaston Maspero
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 355 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12).

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12) eBook

Gaston Maspero
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 355 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12).

The equipment of Egyptian troops was lacking in uniformity, and men armed with slings, or bows and arrows, lances, wooden swords, clubs, stone or metal axes, all fought side by side.  The head was protected by a padded cap, and the body by shields, which were small for light infantry, but of great width for soldiers of the line.  The issue of a battle depended upon a succession of single combats between foes armed with the same weapons; the lancers alone seem to have charged in line behind their huge bucklers.  As a rule, the wounds were trifling, and the great skill with which the shields were used made the risk of injury to any vital part very slight.  Sometimes, however, a lance might be driven home into a man’s chest, or a vigorously wielded sword or club might fracture a combatant’s skull and stretch him unconscious on the ground.  With the exception of those thus wounded and incapacitated for flight, very few prisoners were taken, and the name given to them, “Those struck down alive”—­sokiruonkhu—­sufficiently indicates the method of their capture.  The troops were recruited partly from the domains of military fiefs, partly from tribes of the desert or Nubia, and by their aid the feudal princes maintained the virtual independence which they had acquired for themselves under the last kings of the Memphite line.  Here and there, at Hermopolis, Shit, and Thebes, they founded actual dynasties, closely connected with the Pharaonic dynasty, and even occasionally on an equality with it, though they assumed neither the crown nor the double cartouche.  Thebes was admirably adapted for becoming the capital of an important state.  It rose on the right bank of the Nile, at the northern end of the curve made by the river towards Hermonthis, and in the midst of one of the most fertile plains of Egypt.  Exactly opposite to it, the Libyan range throws out a precipitous spur broken up by ravines and arid amphitheatres, and separated from the river-bank by a mere strip of cultivated ground which could be easily defended.  A troop of armed men stationed on this neck of land could command the navigable arm of the Nile, intercept trade with Nubia at their pleasure, and completely bar the valley to any army attempting to pass without having first obtained authority to do so.  The advantages of this site do not seem to have been appreciated during the Memphite period, when the political life of Upper Egypt was but feeble.  Elephantine, El-Kab, and Koptos were at that period the principal cities of the country.  Elephantine particularly, owing to its trade with the Soudan, and its constant communication with the peoples bordering the Red Sea, was daily increasing in importance.  Hermonthis, the Aunu of the South, occupied much the same position, from a religious point of view, as was held in the Delta by Heliopolis, the Aunu of the North, and its god Montu, a form of the Solar Horus, disputed the supremacy with Minu, of Koptos.  Thebes long continued to be merely an insignificant village of the Uisit nome and a dependency of Hermonthis.  It was only towards the end of the VIIIth dynasty that Thebes began to realize its power, after the triumph of feudalism over the crown had culminated in the downfall of the Memphite kings.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.