History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 399 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 399 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery.
Shirpurla in the end proved too strong for Gishkhu.  The ruler in Shirpurla at this time was Enannadu, who had succeeded his brother Eannadu upon the throne.  He marched out to meet the invading forces of the men of Gishkhu, and a battle was fought in the territory of Shirpurla.  According to one account, the forces of Shirpurla were victorious, while on the cone of Ente-mena no mention is made of the issue of the combat.  The result may not have been decisive, but Enannadu’s action at least checked Urlumma’s encroachments for the time.

It would appear that the death of the reigning patesi in Shirpurla was always the signal for an attack upon that city by the men of Gishkhu.  They may have hoped that the new ruler would prove a less successful leader than the last, or that the accession of a new monarch might give rise to internal dissensions in the city which would weaken Shirpurla’s power of resisting a sudden attack.  As Eannadu’s death had encouraged Urlumma to lead out the men of Gishkhu, so the death of Enannadu seemed to him a good opportunity to make another bid for victory.  But this time the result of the battle was not indecisive.  Entemena had succeeded his father Enannadu, and he led out to victory the forces of Shir-purla.  The battle was fought near the canal Lumma-girnun-ta, and when the men of Gishkhu were put to flight they left sixty of their fellows lying dead upon the banks of the canal.  Entemena tells us that the bones of these warriors were left to bleach in the open plain, but he seems to have buried those of the men of Gishkhu who fell in the pursuit, for he records that in five separate places he piled up burial-mounds in which the bodies of the slain were interred.  Entemena was not content with merely inflicting a defeat upon the army of Gishkhu and driving it back within its own borders, for he followed up his initial advantage and captured the capital itself.  He deposed and imprisoned Urlumma, and chose one of his own adherents to rule as patesi of Gishkhu in his stead.  The man he appointed for this high office was named Hi, and he had up to that time been priest in Ninab.  Entemena summoned him to his presence, and, after marching in a triumphal procession from Girsu in the neighbourhood of Shirpurla to the conquered city, proceeded to invest him with the office of patesi of Gishkhu.

Entemena also repaired the frontier ditches named after Ningirsu and Nina, which had been employed for purposes of irrigation as well as for marking the frontier; and he gave instructions to Hi to employ the men dwelling in the district of Karkar on this work, as a punishment for the active part they had taken in the recent raid into the territory of Shirpurla.  Entemena also restored and extended the system of canals in the region between the Tigris and the Euphrates, lining one of the principal channels with stone.

[Illustration:  175.jpg MARBLE GATE]

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.