History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 399 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 399 pages of information about History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery.
but pursued him across the border and succeeded in conquering the Country of the Sea and in establishing there his own administration.  The gradual conquest of the whole of Babylonia by the Kassites no doubt followed the conquest of the Country of the Sea, for the chronicle relates how the process of subjugation, begun by Ulam-Buriash, was continued by his nephew Agum, and we know from the lists of kings that Ea-gamil was the last king of the dynasty founded by Iluma-ilu.  In this fashion the Second Dynasty was brought to an end, and the Sumerian element in the mixed population of Babylonia did not again succeed in gaining control of the government of the country.

It will be noticed that the account of the earliest Kassite rulers of Babylonia which is given by the new chronicle does not exactly tally with the names of the kings of the Third Dynasty as found upon the list of kings.  On this document the first king of the dynasty is named Gandash, with whom we may probably identify Ulam-Buriash, the Kassite conqueror of the Country of the Sea; the second king is Agum, and the third is Bitiliashi.  According to the new chronicle Agum was the son of Bitiliashi, and it would be improbable that he should have ruled in Babylonia before his father.  But this difficulty is removed by supposing that the two names were transposed by some copyist.  The different names assigned to the founder of the Kassite dynasty may be due to the existence of variant traditions, or Ulam-Buriash may have assumed another name on his conquest of Babylonia, a practice which was usual with the later kings of Assyria when they occupied the Babylonian throne.

The information supplied by the new chronicle with regard to the relations of the first three dynasties to one another is of the greatest possible interest to the student of early Babylonian history.  We see that the Semitic empire founded at Babylon by Sumu-abu, and consolidated by Hammurabi, was not established on so firm a basis as has hitherto been believed.  The later kings of the dynasty, after Elam had been conquered, had to defend their empire from encroachments on the south, and they eventually succumbed before the onslaught of the Sumerian element, which still remained in the population of Babylonia and had rallied in the Country of the Sea.  This dynasty in its turn succumbed before the invasion of the Kassites from the mountains in the western districts of Elam, and, although the city of Babylon retained her position as the capital of the country throughout these changes of government, she was the capital of rulers of different races, who successively fought for and obtained the control of the fertile plains of Mesopotamia.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria in the Light of Recent Discovery from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.