And now, friends and fellow-citizens, it is time to bring
    this discourse to a close.

We have indulged in gratifying recollections of the past, in the prosperity and pleasures of the present, and in high hopes for the future.  But let us remember that we have duties and obligations to perform, corresponding to the blessings which we enjoy.  Let us remember the trust, the sacred trust, attaching to the rich inheritance which we have received from our fathers.  Let us feel our personal responsibility, to the full extent of our power and influence, for the preservation of the principles of civil and religious liberty.  And let us remember that it is only religion, and morals, and knowledge, that can make men respectable, under any form of government....

    DANIEL WEBSTER:  Completion of Bunker Hill
    Monument, 1843

Conclusions are classified in general under three headings:  1.  Recapitulation; 2.  Summary; 3.  Peroration.

The Recapitulation.  The first of these—­recapitulation—­is exactly defined by the etymology of the word itself.  Its root is Latin caput, head.  So recapitulation means the repetition of the heads or main topics of a preceding discussion.  Coming at the end of an important speech of some length, such a conclusion is invaluable.  If the speaker has explained clearly or reasoned convincingly his audience will have been enlightened or convinced.  Then at the end, to assure them they are justified in their knowledge or conviction, he repeats in easily remembered sequence the heads which he has treated in his extended remarks.  It is as though he chose from his large assortment a small package which he does up neatly for his audience to carry away with them.  Frequently, too, the recapitulation corresponds exactly to the plan as announced in the introduction and followed throughout the speech.  This firmly impresses the main points upon the brains of the hearers.

A lawyer in court starts by announcing that he will prove a certain number of facts.  After his plea is finished, in the conclusion of his speech, he recapitulates, showing that he has proved these things.  A minister, a political candidate, a business man, a social worker—­in fact, every speaker will find such a clear-cut listing an informative, convincing manner of constructing a conclusion.  This extract shows a clear, direct, simple recapitulation.

To recapitulate what has been said, we maintain, first, that the Constitution, by its grants to Congress and its prohibitions on the states, has sought to establish one uniform standard of value, or medium of payment.  Second, that, by like means, it has endeavored to provide for one uniform mode of discharging debts, when they are to be discharged without payment.  Third, that these objects are connected, and that the first loses much of its importance, if the last, also, be not accomplished.  Fourth, that,