thousand strong, closed all the mills and coal-pits,
and held meetings, in which, however, the question
discussed was not, as the bourgeoisie had hoped, the
repeal of the Corn Laws, but, “a fair day’s
wages for a fair day’s work.” August
9th they proceeded to Manchester, unresisted by the
authorities (all Liberals), and closed the mills; on
the 11th they were in Stockport, where they met with
the first resistance as they were storming the workhouse,
the favourite child of the bourgeoisie. On the
same day there was a general strike and disturbance
in Bolton, to which the authorities here, too, made
no resistance. Soon the uprising spread throughout
the whole manufacturing district, and all employments,
except harvesting and the production of food, came
to a standstill. But the rebellious operatives
were quiet. They were driven into this revolt
without wishing it. The manufacturers, with the
single exception of the Tory Birley, in Manchester,
had,
contrary to their custom, not opposed
it. The thing had begun without the working-men’s
having any distinct end in view, for which reason they
were all united in the determination not to be shot
at for the benefit of the Corn Law repealing bourgeoisie.
For the rest, some wanted to carry the Charter, others
who thought this premature wished merely to secure
the wages rate of 1840. On this point the whole
insurrection was wrecked. If it had been from
the beginning an intentional, determined working-men’s
insurrection, it would surely have carried its point;
but these crowds who had been driven into the streets
by their masters, against their own will, and with
no definite purpose, could do nothing. Meanwhile
the bourgeoisie, which had not moved a finger to carry
the alliance of February 10th into effect, soon perceived
that the working-men did not propose to become its
tools, and that the illogical manner in which it had
abandoned its law-abiding standpoint threatened danger.
It therefore resumed its law-abiding attitude, and
placed itself upon the side of Government as against
the working-men.
It swore in trusty retainers as special constables
(the German merchants in Manchester took part in this
ceremony, and marched in an entirely superfluous manner
through the city with their cigars in their mouths
and thick truncheons in their hands). It gave
the command to fire upon the crowd in Preston, so
that the unintentional revolt of the people stood
all at once face to face, not only with the whole military
power of the Government, but with the whole property-holding
class as well. The working-men, who had no especial
aim, separated gradually, and the insurrection came
to an end without evil results. Later, the bourgeoisie
was guilty of one shameful act after another, tried
to whitewash itself by expressing a horror of popular
violence by no means consistent with its own revolutionary
language of the spring; laid the blame of insurrection
upon Chartist instigators, whereas it had itself done