evening; has so much to do for the children then that
she cannot get to bed before three o’clock in
the morning; often wet through to the skin, and obliged
to work in that state.” She said:
“My breasts have given me the most frightful
pain, and I have been dripping wet with milk.”
The use of narcotics to keep the children still is
fostered by this infamous system, and has reached
a great extent in the factory districts. Dr.
Johns, Registrar in Chief for Manchester, is of opinion
that this custom is the chief source of the many deaths
from convulsions. The employment of the wife
dissolves the family utterly and of necessity, and
this dissolution, in our present society, which is
based upon the family, brings the most demoralising
consequences for parents as well as children.
A mother who has no time to trouble herself about
her child, to perform the most ordinary loving services
for it during its first year, who scarcely indeed
sees it, can be no real mother to the child, must
inevitably grow indifferent to it, treat it unlovingly
like a stranger. The children who grow up under
such conditions are utterly ruined for later family
life, can never feel at home in the family which they
themselves found, because they have always been accustomed
to isolation, and they contribute therefore to the
already general undermining of the family in the working-class.
A similar dissolution of the family is brought about
by the employment of the children. When they
get on far enough to earn more than they cost their
parents from week to week, they begin to pay the parents
a fixed sum for board and lodging, and keep the rest
for themselves. This often happens from the fourteenth
or fifteenth year. {144} In a word, the children emancipate
themselves, and regard the paternal dwelling as a
lodging-house, which they often exchange for another,
as suits them.
In many cases the family is not wholly dissolved by
the employment of the wife, but turned upside down.
The wife supports the family, the husband sits at
home, tends the children, sweeps the room and cooks.
This case happens very frequently; in Manchester
alone, many hundred such men could be cited, condemned
to domestic occupations. It is easy to imagine
the wrath aroused among the working-men by this reversal
of all relations within the family, while the other
social conditions remain unchanged. There lies
before me a letter from an English working-man, Robert
Pounder, Baron’s Buildings, Woodhouse, Moorside,
in Leeds (the bourgeoisie may hunt him up there; I
give the exact address for the purpose), written by
him to Oastler: {145}