99,239. He cites five factories in which no spinners
whatever are employed, self-actors only being used.
While the number of spindles increased by 10 per
cent., the number of spinners diminished more than
60 per cent. And Leach adds that since 1841,
so many improvements have been introduced by double-decking
and other means, that in some of the factories named,
half the operatives have been discharged. In
one factory alone, where eighty spinners were employed
a short time ago, there are now but twenty left; the
others having been discharged or set at children’s
work for children’s wages. Of Stockport
Leach tells a similar story, that in 1835, 800 spinners
were employed, and in 1840 but 140, though the manufacture
of Stockport has greatly increased during the last
eight or nine years. Similar improvements have
now been made in carding frames, by which one-half
the operatives have been thrown out of employment.
In one factory improved frames have been set up, which
have thrown four hands out of eight out of work, besides
which the employer reduced the wages of the four retained
from eight shillings to seven. The same process
has gone on in the weaving industry; the power-loom
has taken possession of one branch of hand-weaving
after another, and since it produces much more than
the hand-loom, while one weaver can work two looms,
it has superseded a multitude of working-people.
And in all sorts of manufacture, in flax and wool-spinning,
in silk-twisting, the case is the same. The
power-loom, too, is beginning to appropriate one branch
after another of wool and linen-weaving; in Rochdale
alone, there are more power than hand-looms in flannel
and other wool-weaving branches. The bourgeoisie
usually replies to this, that improvements in machinery,
by decreasing the cost of production, supply finished
goods at lower prices, and that these reduced prices
cause such an increase in consumption that the unemployed
operatives soon find full employment in newly-founded
factories. {136} The bourgeoisie is so far correct
that under certain conditions favourable for the general
development of manufacture, every reduction in price
of goods in which the raw material is cheap,
greatly increases consumption, and gives rise to the
building of new factories; but every further word
of the assertion is a lie. The bourgeoisie ignores
the fact that it takes years for these results of the
decrease in price to follow and for new factories to
be built; it is silent upon the point that every improvement
in machinery throws the real work, the expenditure
of force, more and more upon the machine, and so transforms
the work of full-grown men into mere supervision, which
a feeble woman or even a child can do quite as well,
and does for half or two-thirds wages; that, therefore,
grown men are constantly more and more supplanted
and not re-employed by the increase in manufacture;
it conceals the fact that whole branches of industry
fall away, or are so changed that they must be learned