To remedy this evil, Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, in the following century connected with these Ammonian sections his ten canons. These are ten tables, arranged according to the order of Matthew, or where sections are wanting in Matthew, according to the order of the next evangelist that contains them, in such a way as to show at a glance what sections of the other evangelists answer to any given section of that gospel which stands first in order in each canon.
Numbering the four gospels
in order—1, 2, 3, 4—the ten canons
of Eusebius contain as follows:
I.
Sections common to 1, 2, 3, 4.
II.
" 1, 2, 3.
III.
" 1, 3, 4.
IV.
" 1, 2, 4.
V.
" 1, 3.
VI.
" 1, 2.
VII.
" 1, 4.
VIII. "
2, 3.
IX.
" 3, 4.
X.
Sections peculiar to one.
A couple of examples will make this matter plain. Turning to what is now the beginning of the thirteenth chapter of Matthew, we find (the Greek numerals being exchanged for those in common use) the sign 131/II that is, the 131st Ammonian section of Matthew with the second canon of Eusebius. Turning to the table of the second canon, we find, corresponding to the 131st section of Matthew, the 36th of Mark and the 76th of Luke, which contain the parallel passages concerning the sower. Again, connected with Mark 1:23, is the sign, 14/VIII whence we learn, by reference to the eighth canon, that the fourteenth section of Mark answers to the 25th of Luke. By a repetition of the canons as often as necessary, so as to allow each gospel in turn to take the lead, Wordsworth has greatly facilitated the work of comparing parallel passages.
“The Codex Vaticanus B, contains a distribution into sections wholly peculiar. Of these, St. Matthew contains 170, St. Mark 61, etc. The length of these divisions is very