Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 76 pages of information about Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 76 pages of information about Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428.
what would popularly be termed an odd half-penny in every shilling.  For the same reason, the adjustment of prices, in order to be equitable, should be calculated downwards from the pound and florin, not upwards from the penny.  Thus, if a labourer’s wages have been 1s. 3d. a day, his employer must not say that 15 pence are 60 farthings—­that is, 6 cents; but 1s. 3d. is five-eighths of a florin, which amount to about 6 cents 2 millets.

Such is the plan which has been officially laid down for a decimal coinage, and such the steps needful to carry it out.  The only scheme we have seen which materially differs from it is that of Mr H. Norton.  He selects for the highest denomination the half-sovereign, and proposes to call it a ducat.  The shilling, as now in use, would then be the second denomination; the third, he proposes, should be a cent, equal to about 1-1/5th of a penny, and which, he says, would be fairly represented by our large unmilled pennies, if newly christened; the fourth denomination to be a ‘rap,’ the tenth of the cent, and somewhat less than half a farthing.  The great advantage adduced in favour of this scale is, that it would be much more likely than the other to secure general adoption.  The removal of the pound, he says, affects chiefly the higher and educated classes; it leaves the shilling, which is the staple and standard for the masses, and also the penny, with slight alteration, accompanied by the utter removal of the old one.  It is also said, that a half-farthing piece would be a great boon to the poor, especially in Ireland.  The circumstances alleged in recommendation of this scale, are just what appear to us to be its defects.  The continuance of the poor man’s penny would not appear a boon if he found there were to be only ten of them for a shilling; especially as many small articles, which were a penny before, would probably be a penny still, the dealers not finding it convenient to adjust the fraction.  We well remember the dissatisfaction of the poorer classes in Ireland at the equalisation of the currency in 1825.  Hitherto, the native silver coins had been 5d. and 10d. pieces, a British shilling had been a thirteen-penny, and a half-crown, 2s. 8-1/2d.  This half-crown was the usual breakfast-money of gentlemen’s servants—­that is, their weekly allowance for purchasing everything except dinner.  When the servant now went to the huckster’s, and got, as heretofore, 6d. worth of bread, 9d. worth of tea, 4d. worth of sugar, and 5d. worth of butter, there was only 6d. of change to buy another loaf in the middle of the week, instead of 8-1/2d., which was wont to afford, we will not say what, over and above.  It is for a similar reason that we say, if there remain anything which can be either identified or confounded with a penny, it should be lowered rather than raised in value.  Small prices are not easily adjusted, and the temptation in the other case lies on the side of the dealer not to alter them.  It is more certain, for instance,

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.