All this is very right and most worthy of regard.  We do not sing “For they are jolly good fellows” in their honour, but we offer them our profound respect and gratitude.  And our golfer, in his amateurish way, belongs to the tribe.  He has approached Rembrandt through books.  His temperament enjoyed exploring the library hive marked Rembrandt.  Now he feels that he must study the works of the master, and while he is cogitating whether he shall first examine the 35 pictures at St. Petersburg, or the 20 in the Louvre, or the 20 at Cassel, or the 17 at Berlin, or the 16 at Dresden, or the 12 in the National Gallery, or the etchings and drawings in the print room of the British Museum, or the frame of etchings at South Kensington, so accessible, I drop him.  Yes:  drop him in favour of another who did not care two pins about the history or the politics of art, or the rights or wrongs of Rembrandt’s life, but went straight to his pictures and etchings, wondered at them, and was filled with an incommunicable joy.

CHAPTER II

THE APPEAL OF THE PAINTINGS

Suppose our citizen and golfer, deliberately dropped in the preceding chapter, had a child, a son, who by a freak of heredity was brooding and imaginative, fond, in a childish way, of pictures and books, but quite indifferent to scientific criticism and the methods of the analytic men.  During his school holidays his mother would take him to the pantomime, and to the National Gallery.  Dazed, he would scan the walls of pictures, wondering why so many of them dealt with Scriptural subjects, and why some were so coloured, and others so dim.

[Illustration:  PORTRAIT OF A SAVANT

1631.  The Hermitage, St. Petersburg.]

But after the third or fourth visit this child began to recognise favourites among the pictures, and being somewhat melancholy and mystical by nature, liking trees, beechwood glades, cathedral aisles, and the end of day, he would drag upon his mother’s arm when they passed two pictures hanging together in the Dutch room.  One was called The Woman taken in Adultery, the other, The Adoration of the Shepherds.  These pictures by Rembrandt attracted him:  they were so different from anything else in the gallery.  He did not trouble to understand their meaning; he did not dwell upon the beauty of the still figure of Christ, or note that the illumination in The Adoration of the Shepherds proceeded from the supernatural light that shines from the Infant Jesus.  What captivated him was the vastness contained in these small pictures, and the eerie way in which the light was separated from the dark.  He had never seen anything like it before, but these pictures made him long to be grown up and able to seek such sights.  He could see the lurking shadows alone in his bed at night, and held his breath when he thought of the great darkness that stretched out to the frames of the pictures.  He wondered if temples were really as mysterious and dim as the great building that loomed above the small dazzling figure of the kneeling penitent and that horrid man who, his mother told him, was one of her accusers.