Before the little eddy of interruption was ended the reading of the clergyman’s letter was already continuing.

“The proceedings opened with a speech from my colleague, of which I will say nothing.  It was deplorable.  Many of the audience were Irish, and showed the weakness of that impetuous people.  When gathered together into gangs and conspiracies they seem to lose altogether that lovable good-nature and readiness to accept anything one tells them which distinguishes them as individuals.”

With a slight start, Michael rose to his feet, bowed solemnly, and sat down again.

“These persons, if not silent, were at least applausive during the speech of Mr. Percy.  He descended to their level with witticisms about rent and a reserve of labour.  Confiscation, expropriation, arbitration, and such words with which I cannot soil my lips, recurred constantly.  Some hours afterward the storm broke.  I had been addressing the meeting for some time, pointing out the lack of thrift in the working classes, their insufficient attendance at evening service, their neglect of the Harvest Festival, and of many other things that might materially help them to improve their lot.  It was, I think, about this time that an extraordinary interruption occurred.  An enormous, powerful man, partly concealed with white plaster, arose in the middle of the hall, and offered (in a loud, roaring voice, like a bull’s) some observations which seemed to be in a foreign language.  Mr. Raymond Percy, my colleague, descended to his level by entering into a duel of repartee, in which he appeared to be the victor.  The meeting began to behave more respectfully for a little; yet before I had said twelve sentences more the rush was made for the platform.  The enormous plasterer, in particular, plunged towards us, shaking the earth like an elephant; and I really do not know what would have happened if a man equally large, but not quite so ill-dressed, had not jumped up also and held him away.  This other big man shouted a sort of speech to the mob as he was shoving them back.  I don’t know what he said, but, what with shouting and shoving and such horseplay, he got us out at a back door, while the wretched people went roaring down another passage.

“Then follows the truly extraordinary part of my story.  When he had got us outside, in a mean backyard of blistered grass leading into a lane with a very lonely-looking lamp-post, this giant addressed me as follows:  `You’re well out of that, sir; now you’d better come along with me.  I want you to help me in an act of social justice, such as we’ve all been talking about.  Come along!’ And turning his big back abruptly, he led us down the lean old lane with the one lean old lamp-post, we scarcely knowing what to do but to follow him.  He had certainly helped us in a most difficult situation, and, as a gentleman, I could not treat such a benefactor with suspicion without grave grounds.  Such also was the view of my Socialistic colleague, who (with all his dreadful talk of arbitration) is a gentleman also.  In fact, he comes of the Staffordshire Percys, a branch of the old house and has the black hair and pale, clear-cut face of the whole family.  I cannot but refer it to vanity that he should heighten his personal advantages with black velvet or a red cross of considerable ostentation, and certainly—­but I digress.