“Then he added suddenly in a voice of unnatural actuality, `But I know something now, Eames.  I knew it when I saw the clouds turn pink.’

“`What do you mean?’ asked Eames. `What did you know?’

“`I knew for the first time that murder is really wrong.’

“He gripped Dr. Eames’s hand and groped his way somewhat unsteadily to the door.  Before he had vanished through it he had added, `It’s very dangerous, though, when a man thinks for a split second that he understands death.’

“Dr. Eames remained in repose and rumination some hours after his late assailant had left.  Then he rose, took his hat and umbrella, and went for a brisk if rotatory walk.  Several times, however, he stood outside the villa with the spotted blinds, studying them intently with his head slightly on one side.  Some took him for a lunatic and some for an intending purchaser.  He is not yet sure that the two characters would be widely different.

“The above narrative has been constructed on a principle which is, in the opinion of the undersigned persons, new in the art of letters.  Each of the two actors is described as he appeared to the other.  But the undersigned persons absolutely guarantee the exactitude of the story; and if their version of the thing be questioned, they, the undersigned persons, would deucedly well like to know who does know about it if they don’t.

“The undersigned persons will now adjourn to `The Spotted Dog’ for beer.  Farewell.

“(Signed) James Emerson Eames,
“Warden of Brakespeare College, Cambridge.

“Innocent Smith.”

Chapter II

The Two Curates;
or, the Burglary Charge

Arthur Inglewood handed the document he had just read to the leaders of the prosecution, who examined it with their heads together.  Both the Jew and the American were of sensitive and excitable stocks, and they revealed by the jumpings and bumpings of the black head and the yellow that nothing could be done in the way of denial of the document.  The letter from the Warden was as authentic as the letter from the Sub-Warden, however regrettably different in dignity and social tone.

“Very few words,” said Inglewood, “are required to conclude our case in this matter.  Surely it is now plain that our client carried his pistol about with the eccentric but innocent purpose of giving a wholesome scare to those whom he regarded as blasphemers.  In each case the scare was so wholesome that the victim himself has dated from it as from a new birth.  Smith, so far from being a madman, is rather a mad doctor—­ he walks the world curing frenzies and not distributing them.  That is the answer to the two unanswerable questions which I put to the prosecutors.  That is why they dared not produce a line by any one who had actually confronted the pistol.  All who had actually confronted the pistol confessed that they had profited by it.