intelligence.’ Every structure exhibits
with more or less of complexity the principle of order;
it is related to all other things in a universal order.
This universality of order renders irrational the
hypothesis of chance in accounting for the universe.
’Let us think of the supreme causality as we
may, the fact remains that from it there emanates a
directive influence of uninterrupted consistency,
on a scale of stupendous magnitude and exact precision
worthy of our highest conceptions of deity[11].’
The argument was developed in the words of Professor
Baden Powell. ’That which requires reason
and thought to understand must be itself thought and
reason. That which mind alone can investigate
or express must be itself mind. And if the highest
conception attained is but partial, then the mind
and reason studied is greater than the mind and reason
of the student. If the more it is studied the
more vast and complex is the necessary connection
in reason disclosed, then the more evident is the
vast extent and compass of the reason thus partially
manifested and its reality
as existing in the immutably
connected order of objects examined, independently
of the mind of the investigator.’ This
argument from the universal
Kosmos has the advantage
of being wholly independent of the method by which
things came to be what they are. It is unaffected
by the acceptance of evolution. Till quite recently
it seemed irrefutable[12].
’But nevertheless we are constrained to acknowledge
that its apparent power dwindles to nothing in view
of the indisputable fact that, if force and matter
have been eternal, all and every natural law must have
resulted by way of necessary consequence.... It
does not admit of one moment’s questioning that
it is as certainly true that all the exquisite beauty
and melodious harmony of nature follows necessarily
as inevitably from the persistence of force and the
primary qualities of matter as it is certainly true
that force is persistent or that matter is extended
or impenetrable[13].... It will be remembered
that I dwelt at considerable length and with much
earnestness upon this truth, not only because of its
enormous importance in its bearing upon our subject,
but also because no one has hitherto considered it
in that relation.’ It was also pointed
out that the coherence and correspondence of the macrocosm
of the universe with the microcosm of the human mind
can be accounted for by the fact that the human mind
is only one of the products of general evolution,
its subjective relations necessarily reflecting those
external relations of which they themselves are the
product[14].