The defence itself shewed that already a large part of the original position had been abandoned.  The literal meaning and belief in detailed accuracy were given up and Mr. Gladstone sought to establish only a general correspondence between the Biblical narrative and the results of science.  But even in that form Huxley shewed the defence to be untenable.

“I can meet the statement in the last paragraph of the above citation,” he replied, “with nothing but a direct negative.  If I know anything at all about the results attained by the natural science of our time, it is a ’demonstrated conclusion and established fact’ that the fourfold order given by Mr. Gladstone is not that in which the evidence at our disposal tends to shew that the water, air, and land populations of our globe made their appearance.”

With the most voluminous detail, he proceeds to shew that there is no possible relation between the order implied by the narrative and the order as revealed by science.  Let us sum up, by two quotations, the result of the whole controversy.  First, the literal meaning is untenable.

“The question whether the earth and the immediate progenitors of its present living population were made in six natural days or not is no longer one on which two opinions can be held.  The fact that it did not come so into being stands upon as sound a basis as any fact of history whatever.  It is not true that existing plants and animals came into being within three days of the creation of the earth out of nothing, for it is certain that innumerable generations of other plants and animals lived upon the earth before its present population.  And when, Sunday after Sunday, men who profess to be our instructors in righteousness read out the statement, ’In six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is,’ in innumerable churches, they are either propagating what they may easily know, and, therefore, are bound to know, to be falsities; or, if they use the words in some non-natural sense, they fall below the moral standard of the much abused Jesuit.”

The attenuated meaning equally must be given up.

“Even if they (the reconcilers) now allow that the words ’the evening and the morning’ have not the least reference to a natural day, but mean a period of any number of millions of years that may be necessary; even if they are driven to admit that the word ‘creation,’ which so many millions of pious Jews and Christians have held, and still hold, to mean a sudden act of the Deity, signifies a process of gradual evolution of one species from another, extending through immeasurable time; even if they are willing to grant that the asserted coincidence of the order of nature with the ‘fourfold order’ ascribed to Genesis is an obvious error instead of an established truth, they are surely prepared to make a last stand upon the conception which underlies the whole, and which constitutes the essence of