“I esteem it an act of justice due to that officer, to inform your lordships that His Majesty has been graciously pleased entirely to approve of the conduct of Commodore Nelson in all his transactions with the Republic of Genoa.  I have the honour to be, &c, &c.  GRENVILLE.”

The First Lord of the Admiralty about the same time expressed “the great satisfaction derived here from the very spirited, and at the same time dignified and temperate manner, in which your conduct has been marked both at Leghorn and Genoa.”

CHAPTER VII.

NELSON’S SERVICES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN DURING THE YEAR 1796.—­BONAPARTE’S ITALIAN CAMPAIGN.—­THE BRITISH ABANDON CORSICA, AND THE FLEET LEAVES THE MEDITERRANEAN.

JANUARY-DECEMBER, 1796.  AGE, 38.

While the “Agamemnon” was refitting in Leghorn, the sensitive mind of her captain, no longer preoccupied with the cares of campaigning and negotiations, dwelt with restless anxiety upon the reflections to which the British Navy was liable, for its alleged failure to support the Austrians throughout the operations, and especially at the critical moment of the Battle of Loano, when the left flank of their army was harassed with impunity by the French gunboats.  Nelson felt rightly that, with the British superiority at sea, this should have been impossible; and he feared that his own name might be unpleasantly involved, from the fact that the “Agamemnon” had remained throughout at Genoa, instead of being where the fighting was.  He was by nature, and at all times, over-forward to self-vindication,—­an infirmity springing from the innate nobility of his temperament, which was impatient of the faintest suspicion of backwardness or negligence, and at the same time resolved that for any shortcoming or blunder, occurring by his order or sanction, no other than himself should bear blame, directly or indirectly.

After the first unsuccessful pursuit of Bonaparte’s expedition to Egypt, in 1798, in the keenness of his emotions over a failure that might by some be charged to a precipitate error of judgment, he drew up for Lord St. Vincent a clear and able statement of all the reasons which had determined his action, arraigning himself, as it were, at the bar of his lordship’s opinion and that of the nation, and assuming entire responsibility for the apparent mistake, while at the same time justifying the step by a review of the various considerations which at the time had occasioned it.  His judicious friend and subordinate, Captain Ball, whom he consulted, strongly advised him not to send the paper.  “I was particularly struck,” he wrote, “with the clear and accurate style, as well as with the candour of the statement in your letter, but I should recommend a friend never to begin a defence of his conduct before he is accused of error.”  Nevertheless, in February, 1805, when he once more went to Alexandria in search of Villeneuve, this time