beginning of the next year, dating the years of Honorius
from the death of Valentinian; and argues well,
that at this time Pharamond was not only King
by the constitution of the Franks, but crowned
also by the consent of Honorius, and had a
part of Gallia assigned him by covenant.
And this might be the cause that Roman writers
reckoned him the first King: which some not understanding,
have reputed him the founder of this kingdom by an
army of the Transrhenane Franks. He might
come with such an army, but he succeeded Theudomir
by right of blood and consent of the people.
For the above cited passage of Fredigarius,
Extinctis Ducibus, in Francis denuo Reges creantur
ex eadem stirpe qua prius fuerant, implies that
the kingdom continued to this new elected family during
the reign of more Kings than one. If you date
the years of Honorius from the death of his
father, the reign of Pharamond might begin two
years later than is assigned by Bucher.
The Salique laws made in his reign, which are
yet extant, shew by their name that it was the kingdom
of the Salii over which he reigned; and, by
the pecuniary mulcts in them, that the place where
he reigned abounded much with money, and consequently
was within the Empire; rude Germany knowing
not the use of money, till they mixed with the Romans.
In the Preface also to the Salique laws, written
and prefixed to them soon after the conversion of
the Franks to the Christian religion, that
is, in the end of the reign of Merovaeus, or
soon after, the original of this kingdom is thus described:
Haec enim gens, quae fortis dum esset & robore
valida, Romanorum jugum durissimum de suis cervicibus
excussit pugnando, &c. This kingdom therefore
was erected, not by invasion but by rebellion, as
was described above. Prosper in registering
their Kings in order, tells us: Pharamundus
regnat in Francia; Clodio regnat in Francia; Merovaeus
regnat in Francia: and who can imagine but
that in all these places he meant one and the same
Francia? And yet ’tis certain that
the Francia of Merovaeus was in Gallia.
Yet the father of Pharamond, being king of a body of Franks in Germany in the reign of the Emperor Theodosius, as above, Pharamond might reign over the same Franks in Germany before he succeeded Theudomir in the kingdom of the Salians within the Empire, and even before Theudomir began his reign; suppose in the first year of Honorius, or when those Franks being repulsed by Stilico, lost their Kings Marcomir and Suno, one of which was the father of Pharamond: and the Roman Franks, after the death of Theudomir, might invite Pharamond with his people from beyond the Rhine. But we are not to regard the