culpa, mea maxima culpa. But it is open to
him also to protest against the common critical folly
of making an offender for a word: of driving
analogies on all four feet, and straining thoughts
beyond their due proportions. Above all, never
let a reader stir one inch beyond, far less against,
his own judgment: if there seem to be sufficient
reasons, well: if otherwise, let me walk uncompanied.
The first step especially is felt to be a very difficult
one; perhaps very debatable: for aught I know,
it may be merely a vain insect caught in the cobweb
of metaphysics, soon to be destroyed, and easily to
be discussed at leisure by some Aranean logician.
However, it seemed to my midnight musings a probable
mode of arriving at truth, though somewhat unsatisfactorily
told from poverty of thought and language. Moreover,
it would have been, in such a priori argument,
ridiculous to have commenced by announcing a posterior
conclusion: for this cause did I do my humble
best to work it out anew: and however supererogatory
it may seem at first sight to the majority of readers,
those keener minds whom I mainly address, and whose
interests I wish to serve, will recognise the attempt
as at least consistent: and will be ready to
admit that if the arduous effort prove anteriorly a
First Great Cause, and His attributes, be futile (which,
however, I do not admit), it was an attempt unneeded
on the score of its own merits; albeit, with an obvious
somewhat of justice, pure reason may desire to begin
at the beginning. No one, who thinks at all upon
religion, however misbelieving, can entertain any
mental prejudice against the existence of a Deity,
or against the received character of His attributes.
Such a man would be merely in a savage state, irrational:
whilst his own mind, so speculating, would stand itself
proof positive of an Intellectual Father; either immediately,
as in the first man’s case, or mediately, as
in our own, it must have sprung out of that Being,
who is emphatically the Good One—God.
But if, as is possible, a mind, capable of thinking,
and keen to think on other themes, from any cause,
educational or moral, has neglected this great track
of mediation, has “forgotten God,” and
“had him not in all his thoughts,”
such an one I invite to walk with me; and, in spite
of all incompleteness and insufficiency, uncaptious
of much that may haply be fanciful or false, briefly
and in outline to test with me sundry probabilities
of the Christian scheme, considered antecedently to
its elucidation.