but he will certainly be more predisposed to receive
it, if he finds that his weatherglass is falling rather
than rising. The fact remains the same, it rains;
but the mind—precluded by circumstances
from positive personal assurance of such fact, and
able only to arrive at truth from exterior evidence—is
in a fitter state for belief of the fact from being
already made aware that it was probable. Let
it not then be inferred, somewhat perversely, that
because antecedent probabilities are the staple of
our present argument, the theme itself, Religion,
rests upon hypotheses so slender: it rests not
at all upon such straws as probabilities, but on posterior
evidence far more firm. What we now attempt is
not to prop the ark, but favourably to predispose
the mind of any reckless Uzzah, who might otherwise
assail it; not to strengthen the weak places of religion,
but to annul such disinclination to receive Truth,
as consists in prejudice and misconception of its
likelihood. The goodly ship is built upon the
stocks, the platforms are reared, and the cradle is
ready; but mistaken preconceptions may scatter the
incline with gravel-stones rather than with grease,
and thus put a needless hindrance to the launching:
whereas a clear idea that the probabilities are in
favour, rather than the reverse, will make all smooth,
lubricate, and easy. If, then, we fail in this
attempt, no disservice whatever is done to Truth itself;
no breach is made in the walls, no mine sprung, no
battlement dismantled; all the evidences remain as
they were; we have taken nothing away. Even granting
matters seemed anteriorily improbable, still, if evidence
proved them true, such anterior unlikelihood would
entirely be merged in the stoutly proven facts.
Moreover, if we be adjudged to have succeeded, we have
added nothing to Truth itself; no, nor to its outworks.
That sacred temple stands complete, firm and glorious
from corner-stone to top-stone. We do but sweep
away the rubbish at its base; the drifting desert
sands that choke its portals. We only serve that
cause (a most high privilege), by enlisting a prejudgment
in its favour. We propose herein an auxiliary
to evidence, not evidence itself; a finger-post to
point the way to faith; a little light of reason on
its path. The risk is really nothing; but the
advantage, under favour, may be much.
5. It is impossible to elude the discussion of topics, which in their direct tendencies, or remoter inferences, may, to the author at least, prove dangerous or disputable ground. If a “great door and effectual” is opened to him, doubtless he will raise or meet with many adversaries. Besides mere haters of his creed, despisers of his arguments, and protestors, loud and fierce against his errors; he may possibly fall foul of divers unintended heresies; he may stumble unwittingly on the relics of exploded schisms; he may exhume controversies in metaphysical or scholastical polemics, long and worthily extinct. If this be so, he can only plead, Mea culpa, mea