similar to that which separates the Ch’an-tsung
and Lu-tsung or schools of contemplation and of discipline.
Even in the lifetime of Hui-neng there seems to have
been a division, for he is sometimes called the Patriarch
of the South, Shen-Hsiu[807] being recognized as Patriarch
of the North. But all subsequent divisions of
the Ch’an-tsung trace their lineage to Hui-neng.
Two of his disciples founded two schools called Nan
Yueh and Ch’ing Yuan[808] and between the eighth
and tenth centuries these produced respectively two
and three subdivisions, known together as Wu-tsung
or five schools. They take their names from the
places where their founders dwelt and are the schools
of Wei-Yang, Lin-Chi, Ts’ao-Tung, Yun-Men and
Fa-Yen.[809] This is the chronological order, but
the most important school is the Lin-Chi, founded
by I-Hsuan,[810] who resided on the banks of a river[811]
in Chih-li and died in 867. It is not easy to
discriminate the special doctrines[812] of the Lin-Chi
for it became the dominant form of the school to such
an extent that other variants are little more than
names. But it appears to have insisted on the
transmission of spiritual truths not only by oral
instruction but by a species of telepathy between
teacher and pupil culminating in sudden illumination.
At the present day the majority of Chinese monasteries
profess to belong to the Ch’an-tsung and it has
encroached on other schools. Thus it is now accepted
on the sacred island of P’uto which originally
followed the Lu-tsung.
Although the Ch’an school did not value the
study of scripture as part of the spiritual life,
yet it by no means neglected letters and can point
to a goodly array of ecclesiastical authors, extending
down to modern times.[813] More than twenty of their
treatises have been admitted into the Tripitaka.
Several of these are historical and discuss the succession
of Patriarchs and abbots, but the most characteristic
productions of the sect are collections of aphorisms,
usually compiled by the disciples of a teacher who
himself committed nothing to writing.[814]
In opposition to the Contemplative School or Tsung-men,
all the others are sometimes classed together as Chiao-men.
This dichotomy perhaps does no more than justice to
the importance of Bodhidharma’s school, but
is hardly scientific, for, whatever may be the numerical
proportion, the other schools differ from one another
as much as they differ from it. They all agree
in recognizing the authority not only of a founder
but of a special sacred book. We may treat first
of one which, like the Tsung-men, belongs specially
to the Buddhism of the Far East and is both an offshoot
of the Tsung-men and a protest against it—there
being nothing incompatible in this double relationship.
This is the T’ien-t’ai[815] school which
takes its name from a celebrated monastery in the
province of Che-kiang. The founder of this establishment
and of the sect was called Chih-K’ai or Chih-I[816]
and followed originally Bodhidharma’s teaching,