constitutes the fundamental Life superior to the world,
and has been present throughout the whole of the Christian
era; and it is this Substance which has raised men
beyond the merely human situation; it is the Substance
that has enabled men to overcome the world, and afterwards
to see the world from the standpoint of the Divine.
In this work of differentiation we are dependent in
a very large measure upon the results of knowledge.
Such results do not grant us the Substance of Christianity,
because this is something which has to be lived into
in order to be possessed. The transformation
which occurs on account of a change in the Existential-form
may indeed prove helpful to the spiritual nucleus
itself, because it represents a truth of the intellect-a
truth which does not conflict with any [p.185] knowledge
outside its own sphere. There are many dangers
to be discovered in this process of interpreting the
spiritual nucleus. A mode of interpretation whose
meaning has very largely passed away is bound to prove
injurious, because it comes into sharp conflict with
a newer and more comprehensive meaning, and consequently
Christianity fails to win the support of those who
are acquainted with the new Existential-form.
And even the individual who retains the old clothing,
and looks upon it as being something of the same nature
as the spiritual nucleus, is in danger of basing a
portion of his religion on a foundation of sand.
But, on the other hand, he who is aware of the flaws
of the old Existential-form without having assimilated
the Spiritual Substance which lies beneath it, is
in danger of drifting from religion altogether.
The only way of serving best and carrying farther
the development of the Christian religion is to grasp
and experience deeply the fact that the Spiritual
Substance is something entirely different from its
form of existence. Its form of existence is an
attempt to account for the Substance; it consists
of intellectual concepts. And as with everything
else in this world so with religion; mere intellectual
concepts change, and cannot be more than receptacles
used by the human mind to enshrine the things which
are presented as meanings and values within the soul.
[p.186] Eucken pays great attention to the necessity
of this process of differentiation between the two
elements in Christianity. There is a need to-day
of a new form of existence for Christianity; but the
satisfaction of this need will not grant us the spiritual
nucleus itself. The spiritual nucleus is something
to be gained not by means of knowledge, but by means
of love. Eucken goes so far as to state that the
idea of love and love of one’s enemy as presented
in Christianity forms a new element for the redemption
of the individual and of the race. To grasp this
idea and to penetrate into its nature is to solve all
the problems of life and death. This is the Eternal
element in the Christian religion. It is found,
it is true, in other religions; but why should we