in at atmospheric pressure. In its upward stroke
the piston was free to move; but in its downward stroke
it was connected with a ratchet, and the partial vacuum
formed after the explosion beneath the piston, together
with its own weight in falling, operated through a
rack, and caused rotation of the flywheel. This
engine (which, in an improved form, uses only about
20 cubic feet of gas) is still largely employed, some
1,600 having been constructed. The great objection
to it was the noise it produced, and the wear and
tear of the ratchet and rack arrangements. In
1876 the Otto-Crossley silent engine was introduced.
As you are aware, it is a single-acting engine, in
which the gas and air are drawn in by the first outward,
and compressed by the first inward stroke. The
compressed mixture is then ignited; and, being expanded
by heat, drives the piston outward by the second outward
stroke. Near the end of this stroke the exhaust-valve
is opened, the products of combustion partly escape,
and are partly driven out by the second inward stroke.
I say partly, for a considerable clearance space,
equal to 38 per cent. of the whole cylinder volume,
remains unexhausted at the inner end of the cylinder.
When working to full power, only one stroke out of
every four is effective; but this engine works with
only 18 to 22 cubic feet of gas per horse power.
Up to the present time I am informed that about 18,000
of these engines have been manufactured. Several
other compression engines have been introduced, of
which the best known is Mr. Dugald Clerk’s,
using about 20 feet of Glasgow cannel gas. It
gives one effective stroke for every revolution; the
mixture being compressed in a separate air-pump.
But this arrangement leads to additional friction;
and the power measured by the brake is a smaller percentage
of the indicated horse power than in the Otto-Crossley
engine. A number of gas engines—such
as Bisschop’s (much used for very small powers),
Robson’s (at present undergoing transformation
in the able hands of Messrs. Tangye), Korting’s,
and others—are in use; but, so far as I
can learn, all require a larger quantity of gas than
those previously referred to.
[Illustration: OTTO ATMOSPHERIC GAS ENGINE.]
[Illustration: CLERCK’S GAS ENGINE, 6 HORSE POWER.]
[Illustration: OTTO-CROSSLEY GAS ENGINE, 16 H.P.
Consumption
17.6 cubic feet of 16-candle gas per
theoretical
horse power per hour.
Average
pressure, 90.4 x constant, .568 theoretical
horse
power per pound = 50.8 theoretical horse power.]
[Illustration: ATKINSON’S DIFFERENTIAL GAS ENGINE, 8 H.P.]