Penda and Wulfhere, had risen to the second place,
now assumed the first position among the Teutonic kingdoms.
Unfortunately we know little of the period of Mercian
supremacy. The West Saxon chronicle contains
few notices of the rival state, and we are thrown
for information chiefly on the second-hand Latin historians
of the twelfth century. AEthelbald, the first
powerful Mercian king (716-755), “ravaged the
land of the Northumbrians,” and made Wessex
acknowledge his supremacy. By this time all the
minor kingdoms had practically become subject to the
three great powers, though still retaining their native
princes: and Wessex, Mercia, and Northumbria
shared between them, as suzerains, the whole of Teutonic
Britain. The meagre annals of the Chronicle,
upon which alone (with the Charters and Latin writers
of later date) we rest after the death of Baeda, show
us a chaotic list of wars and battles between these
three great powers themselves, or between them and
their vassals, or with the Welsh and Devonians.
AEthelbald was succeeded, after a short interval, by
Offa, whose reign of nearly forty years (758-796),
is the first settled period in English history.
Offa ruled over the subject princes with rigour, and
seems to have made his power really felt. He drove
the Prince of Powys from Shrewsbury, and carried his
ravages into the heart of Wales. He conquered
the land between the Severn and the Wye, and his dyke
from the Dee to the Severn, and the Wye, marked the
new limits of the Welsh and English borders; while
his laws codified the customs of Mercia, as those
of AEthelberht and Ine had done with the customs of
Kent and Wessex. He set up for awhile an archbishopric
at Lichfield, which seems to mark his determination
to erect Mercia into a sovereign power. He also
founded the great monastery of St. Alban’s, and
is said to have established the English college at
Rome, though another account attributes it to Ine,
the West Saxon. East Anglia, Kent, Essex, and
Sussex all acknowledged his supremacy. Karl the
Great was then reviving the Roman Empire in its Germanic
form, and Offa ventured to correspond with the Frank
emperor as an equal. The possession of London,
now a Mercian city, gave Offa an interest in continental
affairs; and the growth of trade is marked by the
fact that when a quarrel arose between them, they
formally closed the ports of their respective kingdoms
against each other’s subjects.
Nevertheless, English kingship still remained a mere
military office, and consolidation, in our modern
sense, was clearly impossible. Local jealousies
divided all the little kingdoms and their component
principalities; and any real subordination was impracticable
amongst a purely agricultural and warlike people,
with no regular army, and governed only by their own
anarchic desires. Like the Afghans of the present
time, the early English were incapable of union, except
in a temporary way under the strong hand of a single
warlike leader against a common foe. As soon
as that was removed, they fell asunder at once into
their original separateness. Hence the chaotic
nature of our early annals, in which it is impossible
to discover any real order underlying the perpetual
flux of states and princes.