too. Such an opinion can only be based on a strange
confusion between subject and treatment. There
is scarcely any subject not tainted by impurity, that
cannot be treated with entire refinement. Washington
Irving wrote to Dickens, most justly, of “that
exquisite tact that enabled him to carry his reader
through the veriest dens of vice and villainy without
a breath to shock the ear or a stain to sully the
robe of the most shrinking delicacy;” and added:
“It is a rare gift to be able to paint low life
without being low, and to be comic without the least
taint of vulgarity.” This is well said;
and if we look for the main secret of the inherent
refinement of Dickens’ books, we shall find
it, I think, in this: that he never intentionally
paltered with right and wrong. He would make
allowance for evil, would take pleasure in showing
that there were streaks of lingering good in its blackness,
would treat it kindly, gently, humanly. But it
always stood for evil, and nothing else. He made
no attempt by cunning jugglery to change its seeming.
He had no sneaking affection for it. And therefore,
I say again, his attachment to Eugene Wrayburn has
always struck me with surprise. As regards Dickens’
own refinement, I cannot perhaps do better than quote
the words of Sir Arthur Helps, an excellent judge.
“He was very refined in his conversation—at
least, what I call refined—for he was one
of those persons in whose society one is comfortable
from the certainty that they will never say anything
which can shock other people, or hurt their feelings,
be they ever so fastidious or sensitive.”
FOOTNOTES:
[26] His foolish quarrel with Bradbury and Evans had
necessitated the abandonment of Household Words.
[27] See his pamphlet, “The Artist and the Author.”
The matter is fully discussed in his life by Mr. Blanchard
Jerrold.
[28] Buss’s illustrations were executed under
great disadvantages, and are bad. Those of Seymour
are excellent.
[29] I am always sorry, however, that Cruikshank did
not illustrate the Christmas stories.
[30] See Cornhill Magazine for February, 1864.
CHAPTER XIII.
But we are now, alas, nearing the point where the
“rapid” of Dickens’ life began to
“shoot to its fall.” The year 1865,
during which he partly wrote “Our Mutual Friend,”
was a fatal one in his career. In the month of
February he had been very ill, with an affection of
the left foot, at first thought to be merely local,
but which really pointed to serious mischief, and
never afterwards wholly left him. Then, on June
9th, when returning from France, where he had gone
to recruit, he as nearly as possible lost his life
in a railway accident at Staplehurst. A bridge
had broken in; some of the carriages fell through,
and were smashed; that in which Dickens was, hung down
the side of the chasm. Of courage and presence