in the same way. His course has excited considerable
alarm. Timid men consider it as a proof of the
weakness of our government, and that it is to be rent
into pieces by demagogues and to end in anarchy.
I survey the scene with a different eye, and draw
a different augury from it. In a House of Representatives
of a great mass of good sense, Mr. Randolph’s
popular eloquence gave him such advantages as to place
him unrivalled as the leader of the House; and, although
not conciliatory to those whom he led, principles of
duty and patriotism induced many of them to swallow
humiliations he subjected them to, and to vote as
was right, as long as he kept the path of right himself.
The sudden defection of such a man could not but produce
a momentary astonishment, and even dismay; but for
a moment only. The good sense of the House rallied
around its principles, and, without any leader, pursued
steadily the business of the session, did it well,
and by a strength of vote which has never before been
seen. Upon all trying questions, exclusive of
the federalists, the minority of republicans voting
with him, has been from four to six or eight, against
from ninety to one hundred; and although he yet treats
the federalists with ineffable contempt, yet having
declared eternal opposition to this administration,
and consequently associated with them in his votes,
he will, like Mercer, end with them. The augury
I draw from this is that there is a steady good sense
in the legislature, and in the body of the nation,
joined with good intentions, which will lead them to
discern and to pursue the public good under all circumstances
which can arise, and that no ignis faiuus will
be able to lead them long astray. In the present
case, the public sentiment, as far as declarations
of it have yet come in, is, without a single exception,
in firm adherence to the administration. One
popular paper is endeavoring to maintain equivocal
ground; approving the administration in all its proceedings,
and Mr. Randolph in all those which have heretofore
merited approbation, carefully avoiding to mention
his late aberration. The ultimate view of this
paper is friendly to you, and the editor, with more
judgment than him who assumes to be at the head of
your friends, sees that the ground of opposition to
the administration is not that on which it would be
advantageous to you to be planted. The great body
of your friends are among the firmest adherents to
the administration, and in their support of you will
suffer Mr. Randolph to have no communications with
them. My former letter told you the line which
both duty and inclination would lead me sacredly to
pursue. But it is unfortunate for you, to be
embarrassed with such a soi-disant friend.
You must not commit yourself to him. These views
may assist you to understand such details as Mr. Pinckney
will give you. If you are here at any time before
the fall, it will be in time for any object you may
have, and by that time the public sentiment will be