But Hamilton was not only a monarchist, but for a monarchy bottomed on corruption.  In proof of this, I will relate an anecdote, for the truth of which I attest the God who made me.  Before the President set out on his southern tour in April, 1791, he addressed a letter of the fourth of that month, from Mount Vernon, to the Secretaries of State, Treasury, and War, desiring that if any serious and important cases should arise during his absence, they would consult and act on them.  And he requested that the Vice-President should also be consulted.  This was the only occasion on which that officer was ever requested to take part in a cabinet question.  Some occasion for consultation arising, I invited those gentlemen (and the Attorney General, as well as I remember,) to dine with me, in order to confer on the subject.  After the cloth was removed, and our question agreed and dismissed, conversation began on other matters, and, by some circumstance, was led to the British constitution, on which Mr. Adams observed, ’Purge that constitution of its corruption, and give to its popular branch equality of representation, and it would be the most perfect constitution ever devised by the wit of man.’  Hamilton paused and said, ’Purge it of its corruption, and give to its popular branch equality of representation, and it would become an impracticable government:  as it stands at present, with all its supposed defects, it is the most perfect government which ever existed.’  And this was assuredly the exact line which separated the political creeds of these two gentlemen.  The one was for two hereditary branches and an honest elective one:  the other, for an hereditary King, with a House of Lords and Commons corrupted to his will, and standing between him and the people.  Hamilton was, indeed, a singular character.  Of acute understanding, disinterested, honest, and honorable in all private transactions, amiable in society, and duly valuing virtue in private life, yet so bewitched and perverted by the British example, as to be under thorough conviction that corruption was essential to the government of a nation.  Mr. Adams had originally been a republican.  The glare of royalty and nobility, during his mission to England, had made him believe their fascination a necessary ingredient in government; and Shays’s rebellion, not sufficiently understood where he then was, seemed to prove that the absence of want and oppression, was not a sufficient guarantee of order.  His book on the American Constitutions having made known his political bias, he was taken up by the monarchical federalists in his absence, and, on his return to the United States, he was by them made to believe that the general disposition of our citizens was favorable to monarchy.  He here wrote his Davila, as a supplement to the former work, and his election to the Presidency confirmed him in his errors.  Innumerable addresses too, artfully and industriously poured in upon him, deceived him into a confidence that he was on the pinnacle