TO THOMAS PAINE.

Washington, June 5, 1805.

Dear Sir,

Your letters, Nos. 1, 2, 3, the last of them dated April the 20th, were received April the 26th.  I congratulate you on your retirement to your farm, and still more that it is of a character so worthy of your attention.  I much doubt whether the open room on your second story will answer your expectations.  There will be a few days in the year in which it will be delightful, but not many.  Nothing but trees, or Venetian blinds, can protect it from the sun.  The semi-cylindrical roof you propose will have advantages.  You know it has been practised on the cloth market at Paris.  De Lorme, the inventor, shows many forms of roofs in his book, to which it is applicable.  I have used it at home for a dome, being one hundred and twenty degrees of an oblong octagon, and in the capitol we unite two quadrants of a sphere by a semi-cylinder:  all framed in De Lorme’s manner.  How has your planing machine answered?  Has it been tried and persevered in by any workman?

France has become so jealous of our conduct as to St. Domingo (which in truth is only the conduct of our merchants), that the offer to become a mediator would only confirm her suspicions.  Bonaparte, however, expressed satisfaction at the paragraph in my message to Congress on the subject of that commerce.  With respect to the German redemptioners, you know I can do nothing, unless authorized by law.  It would be made a question in Congress, whether any of the enumerated objects to which the constitution authorizes the money of the Union to be applied, would cover an expenditure for importing settlers to Orleans.  The letter of the revolutionary sergeant was attended to by General Dearborn, who wrote to him informing him how to proceed to obtain his land.

Doctor Eustis’s observation to you, that ’certain paragraphs in the National Intelligencer,’ respecting my letter to you, ’supposed to be under Mr. Jefferson’s direction, had embarrassed Mr. Jefferson’s friends in Massachusetts; that they appeared like a half denial of the letter, or as if there was something in it not proper to be owned, or that needed an apology,’ is one of those mysterious half confidences difficult to be understood.  That tory printers should think it advantageous to identify me with that paper, the Aurora, &c. in order to obtain ground for abusing me, is perhaps fair warfare.  But that any one who knows me personally should listen one moment to such an insinuation, is what I did not expect.  I neither have, nor ever had, any more connection with those papers than our antipodes have; nor know what is to be in them until I see it in them, except proclamations and other documents sent for publication.  The friends in Massachusetts who could be embarrassed by so weak a weapon as this, must be feeble friends indeed.  With respect to the letter, I never hesitated to avow and to justify it in conversation.  In no other way do I trouble myself to contradict any thing which is said.  At that time, however, there were certain anomalies in the motions of some of our friends, which events have at length reduced to regularity.