Th:  Jefferson.

LETTER CLXIV.—­TO WILLIAM T. BARRY, July 2, 1822

TO WILLIAM T. BARRY.

Monticello, July 2, 1822.

Sir,

Your favor of the 15th of June is received, and I am very thankful for the kindness of its expressions respecting myself.  But it ascribes to me merits which I do not claim.  I was only of a band devoted to the cause of independence, all of whom exerted equally their best endeavors for its success, and have a common right to the merits of its acquisition.  So also in the civil revolution of 1801.  Very many and very meritorious were the worthy patriots who assisted in bringing back our government to its republican tack.  To preserve it in that will require unremitting vigilance.  Whether the surrender of our opponents, their reception into our camp, their assumption of our name, and apparent accession to our objects, may strengthen or weaken the genuine principles of republicanism, may be a good or an evil, is yet to be seen.  I consider the party division of whig and tory the most wholesome which can exist in any government, and well worthy of being nourished, to keep out those of a more dangerous character.  We already see the power, installed for life, responsible to no authority (for impeachment is not even a scare-crow), advancing with a noiseless and steady pace to the great object of consolidation.  The foundations are already deeply laid by their decisions, for the annihilation of constitutional State rights, and the removal of every check, every counterpoise to the ingulphing* power of which themselves are to make a sovereign part.  If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface.  This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reformation and revolution.  If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable.  Before the canker is become inveterate, before its venom has reached so much of the body politic as to get beyond control, remedy should be applied.  Let the future appointments of judges be for four or six years, and renewable by the President and Senate.  This will bring their conduct, at regular periods, under revision and probation, and may keep them in equipoise between the general and special governments.  We have erred in this point, by copying England, where certainly it is a good thing to have the judges independent of the King.  But we have omitted to copy their caution also, which makes a judge removable on the address of both legislative Houses.  That there should be public functionaries independent of the nation, whatever may be their demerit, is a solecism in a republic, of the first order of absurdity and inconsistency.