Your favor of March the 27th is received, and, as you request, a copy of the syllabus is now enclosed.  It was originally written to Dr. Rush.  On his death, fearing that the inquisition of the public might get hold of it, I asked the return of it from the family, which they kindly complied with.  At the request of another friend, I had given him a copy.  He lent it to his friend to read, who copied it, and in a few months it appeared in the Theological Magazine of London.  Happily that repository is scarcely known in this country; and the syllabus, therefore, is still a secret, and in your hands I am sure it will continue so.

But while this syllabus is meant to place the character of Jesus in its true and high light, as no impostor himself, but a great reformer of the Hebrew code of religion, it is not to be understood that I am with him in all his doctrines.  I am a Materialist; he takes the side of Spiritualism:  he preaches the efficacy of repentance towards forgiveness of sin; I require a counterpoise of good works to redeem it, &c. &c.  It is the innocence of his character, the purity and sublimity of his moral precepts, the eloquence of his inculcations, the beauty of the apologues in which he conveys them, that I so much admire; sometimes, indeed, needing indulgence to eastern hyperbolism.  My eulogies, too, may be founded on a postulate which all may not be ready to grant.  Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again, of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being.  I separate, therefore, the gold from the dross; restore to him the former, and leave the latter to the stupidity of some, and roguery of others of his disciples.  Of this band of dupes and impostors, Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.  These palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart.  I found the work obvious and easy, and that his part composed the most beautiful morsel of morality which has been given to us by man.  The syllabus is therefore of his doctrine, not all of mine:  I read them as I do those of other ancient and modern moralists, with a mixture of approbation and dissent.

I rejoice, with you, to see an encouraging spirit of internal improvement prevailing in the States.  The opinion I have ever expressed of the advantages of a western communication through the James River, I still entertain; and that the Cayuga is the most promising of the links of communication.