Satanic spirit, in which the same enemy had intercepted and published, in 1776, your letter animadverting on Dickinson’s character.  How it happened that I quoted you in my letter to Doctor Priestley, and for whom, and not for yourself, the strictures were meant, has been explained to you in my letter of the 15th, which had been committed to the post eight days before I received yours of the 10th, 11th, and 14th.  That gave you the reference which these asked to the particular answer alluded to in the one to Priestley.  The renewal of these old discussions, my friend, would be equally useless and irksome.  To the volumes then written on these subjects, human ingenuity can add nothing new, and the rather, as lapse of time has obliterated many of the facts.  And shall you and I, my Dear Sir, at our age, like Priam of old, gird on the

[Illustration:  page203]

Shall we, at our age, become the athletes of party, and exhibit ourselves, as gladiators, in the arena of the newspapers?  Nothing in the universe could induce me to it.  My mind has been long fixed to bow to the judgment of the world, who will judge by my acts, and will never take counsel from me as to what that judgment shall be.  If your objects and opinions have been misunderstood, if the measures and principles of others have been wrongfully imputed to you, as I believe they have been, that you should leave an explanation of them, would be an set of justice to yourself.  I will add, that it has been hoped that you would leave such explanations as would place every saddle on its right horse, and replace on the shoulders of others the burdens they shifted to yours.

But all this, my friend, is offered merely for your consideration and judgment, without presuming to anticipate what you alone are qualified to decide for yourself.  I mean to express my own purpose only, and the reflections which have led to it.  To me, then, it appears, that there have been differences of opinion and party differences, from the first establishment of governments to the present day, and on the same question which now divides our own country:  that these will continue through all future time:  that every one takes his side in favor of the many, or of the few, according to his constitution, and the circumstances in which he is placed:  that opinions, which are equally honest on both sides, should not affect personal esteem or social intercourse:  that as we judge between the Claudii and the Gracchi, the Wentworths and the Hampdens of past ages, so, of those among us whose names may happen to be remembered for a while, the next generations will judge, favorably or unfavorably, according to the complexion of individual minds, and the side they shall themselves have taken:  that nothing new can be added by you or me to what has been said by others, and will be said in every age in support of the conflicting opinions on government:  and that wisdom and duty dictate an humble resignation to the verdict of our future peers.  I doing this myself, I shall certainly not suffer moot questions to affect the sentiments of sincere friendship and respect, consecrated to you by so long a course of time, and of which I now repeat sincere assurances,