be ascribed to that difference of opinion. A
coalition of sentiments is not for the interest of
the printers. They, like the clergy, live by the
zeal they can kindle, and the schisms they can create.
It is contest of opinion in politics as well as religion
which makes us take great interest in them, and bestow
our money liberally on those who furnish aliment to
our appetite. The mild and simple principles of
the Christian philosophy would produce too much calm,
too much regularity of good, to extract from its disciples
a support for a numerous priesthood, were they not
to sophisticate it, ramify it, split it into hairs,
and twist its texts till they cover the divine morality
of its author with mysteries, and require a priesthood
to explain them. The Quakers seem to have discovered
this. They have no priests, therefore no schisms.
They judge of the text by the dictates of common sense
and common morality. So the printers can never
leave us in a state of perfect rest and union of opinion.
They would be no longer useful, and would have to go
to the plough. In the first moments of quietude
which have succeeded the election, they seem to have
aroused their lying faculties beyond their ordinary
state, to re-agitate the public mind. What appointments
to office have they detailed which had never been
thought of, merely to found a text for their calumniating
commentaries. However, the steady character of
our countrymen is a rock to which we may safely moor:
and notwithstanding the efforts of the papers to disseminate
early discontents, I expect that a just, dispassionate,
and steady conduct will at length rally to a proper
system the great body of our country. Unequivocal
in principle, reasonable in manner, we shall be able,
I hope, to do a great deal of good to the cause of
freedom and harmony. I shall be happy to hear
from you often, to know your own sentiments and those
of others on the course of things, and to concur with
you in efforts for the common good. Your letters
through the post will now come safely. Present
my best respects to Mrs. Gerry, and accept yourself
assurances of my constant esteem and high consideration.
Th: Jefferson.
LETTER CCLXXXIV.—TO GIDEON GRANGER, May 3, 1801
TO GIDEON GRANGER.
Washington, May 3, 1801.
Dear Sir,
I wrote you on the 29th of March. Yours of the 25th of that month, with the address it covered, had not reached this place on the 1st of April, when I set out on a short visit to my residence in Virginia, where some arrangements were necessary previous to my settlement here. In fact, your letter came to me at Monticello only the 24th of April, two days before my departure from thence. This, I hope, will sufficiently apologize for the delay of the answer, which those unapprized of these circumstances will have thought extraordinary.