was no vacancy at present. However, he would
hazard his first thoughts on the subject, saving the
right of correcting them by further consideration.
They were these: that there was a loose expression
in one of de Moustier’s letters, which might
be construed into a petition for leave of absence;
that he would give him permission to return to France;
that it had been before decided, on the request of
the Marquis de la Luzerne, that Otto should go to
him to London; that they would send a person to America
as
Charge des Affaires in place of Otto, and
that if the President (General Washington) approved
of him, he should be afterwards made minister.
He had cast his eye on Colonel Ternant, and desired
the Marquis to consult me, whether he would be agreeable.
At first I hesitated, recollecting to have heard Ternant
represented in America, as an hypochondriac, discontented
man, and paused for a moment between him and Barthelemy,
at London, of whom I have heard a great deal of good.
However, I concluded it safer to take one whom we knew
and who knew us. The Marquis was decidedly of
this opinion. Ternant will see that his predecessor
is recalled for unconciliatory deportment, and that
he will owe his own promotion to the approbation of
the President. He established a solid reputation
in Europe, by his conduct when Generalissimo of one
of the United Provinces, during their late disturbances;
and it is generally thought, that if he had been put
at the head of the principal province, instead of
the Rhingrave de Salm, he would have saved that cause.
Upon the whole, I believe you may expect that the
Count de Moustier will have an immediate leave of absence,
which will soon after become a recall in effect.
I will try also to have the consuls admonished as
to the line of conduct they should observe. I
shall have the honor of writing you a general letter,
within a few days. I have now that of assuring
you of the sentiments of sincere esteem and respect,
with which I am, Dear Sir, your most obedient and most
humble servant,
Th: Jefferson.
LETTER CLXXXIII.—TO WILLIAM SHORT, February 9,1789
TO WILLIAM SHORT.
Paris, February 9,1789.
Dear Sir,
I wrote you last on the 22nd of January, on which
day I received yours of December the 31st, and since
that, the other of January the 14th. We have
now received news from America down to the middle of
December. They had then had no cold weather.
All things relative to our new constitution were going
on well. Federal senators are; New Hampshire,
President Langdon and Bartlett. Massachusetts,
Strong and Dalton. Connecticut, Dr. Johnson and
Ellsworth. New Jersey, Patterson and Ellmer.
Pennsylvania, Robert Morris and M’Clay.
Delaware, Reed and Bassett. Virginia, Richard
Henry Lee and Grayson. Maryland, Charles Carroll,
of Carrolton, and John Henry. All of these are
federalists, except those of Virginia; so that a majority