Dr. Rush took notice, that the decay of the liberties of the Dutch republic proceeded from three causes. 1.  The perfect unanimity requisite on all occasions. 2.  Their obligation to consult their constituents. 3.  Their voting by provinces.  This last destroyed the equality of representation, and the liberties of Great Britain also are sinking from the same defect.  That a part of our rights is deposited in the hands of our legislatures.  There, it was admitted, there should be an equality of representation.  Another part of our rights is deposited in the hands of Congress; why is it not equally necessary, there should be an equal representation there?  Were it possible to collect the whole body of the people together, they would determine the questions submitted to them by their majority.  Why should not the same majority decide, when voting here, by their representatives?  The larger colonies are so providentially divided in situation, as to render every fear of their combining visionary.  Their interests are different, and their circumstances dissimilar.  It is more probable they will become rivals, and leave it in the power of the smaller states to give preponderance to any scale they please.  The voting by the number of free inhabitants, will have one excellent effect, that of inducing the colonies to discourage slavery, and to encourage the increase of their free inhabitants.

Mr. Hopkins observed, there were four larger, four smaller, and four middle-sized colonies.  That the four largest would contain more than half the inhabitants of the confederating states, and therefore would govern the others as they should please.  That history affords no instance of such a thing as equal representation.  The Germanic body votes by states.  The Helvetic body does the same; and so does the Belgic confederacy.  That too little is known of the ancient confederations, to say what was their practice.

Mr. Wilson thought, that taxation should be in proportion to wealth, but that representation should accord with the number of freemen.  That government is a collection or result of the wills of all:  that if any government could speak the will of all, it would be perfect; and that, so far as it departs from this, it becomes imperfect.  It has been said, that Congress is a representation of states, not of individuals.  I say, that the objects of its care are all the individuals of the states.  It is strange, that annexing the name of ‘State’ to ten thousand men, should give them an equal right with forty thousand.  This must be the effect of magic, not of reason.  As to those matters which are referred to Congress, we are not so many states; we are one large state.  We lay aside our individuality, whenever we come here.  The Germanic body is a burlesque on government:  and their practice on any point, is a sufficient authority and proof that it is wrong.  The greatest imperfection in the constitution of the Belgic confederacy is their