to occur in their own life-time; and it has not occurred
yet. “The Lord said unto my Lord”
is better rendered “The Eternal said unto my
lord the King”; and is “a simple promise
of victory to a royal leader.” So, in something
less than four pages, he dismisses the proof from
Prophecy, and goes on to the proof from Miracles.
“Whether we attack them or whether we defend
them, does not much matter. The human mind, as
its experience widens, is turning away from them.
And for this reason:
it sees, as its experience
widens, how they arise.” Our duty,
then, if we love Jesus Christ and value the New Testament,
is to make men see that the claim of Christianity to
our allegiance is not based upon Miracles, but rests
on quite other grounds, substantial and indestructible.
The good faith of the writers of the New Testament—the
“reporters of Jesus,” as Arnold oddly calls
them—is admitted; but, if we are to read
their narratives to any profit, we must convince ourselves
of their “liability to mistake.” Excited,
impassioned, wonder-loving disciples surrounded the
simplest acts and words of Christ with a thaumaturgical
atmosphere, and, when He merely exercised His power
of moral help and healing, the “reporters”
declared that He cured the sick and drove out evil
spirits. In brief, when the “reporters”
narrated miracles wrought by Christ, they were deceived;
but, in spite of that, they were excellent men, and
our obligations to them are great. “Reverence
for all who, in those first dubious days of Christianity,
chose the better part, and resolutely cast in their
lot with ‘the despised and rejected of men’!
Gratitude to all who, while the tradition was yet
fresh, helped by their writings to preserve and set
clear the precious record of the words and life of
Jesus!”
And yet that record, as they wrote it, is, according
to Arnold, brimful of errors, both in fact and in
interpretation; and the Church, which has preserved
their written tradition, and kept it concurrently with
her own oral tradition, has fallen into enormous and
fundamental delusion about those “words”
and that “life.” “Christianity
is immortal; it has eternal truth, inexhaustible value,
a boundless future. But our popular religion
at present conceives the birth, ministry, and death
of Christ as altogether steeped in prodigy, brimful
of miracles—and miracles do not happen.”
The fact that, in the preface to the popular edition
of Literature and Dogma, he italicized those
last words would appear to show that he attached some
special, almost “thaumaturgical,” value
to them. Miracles do not happen. It has been
justly observed that any man, woman, or child that
ever lived might have said this, and have caused no
startling sensation. But when Arnold uttered
these words, emphasized them, and seemed to base his
case against the Catholic creed upon them, it behoved
his disciples to ponder them, and to enquire if, and
how far, they were true.