As a matter of fact it was a sumptuary law which incited the women of Rome to make their first great public demonstration, and to besiege the Forum as belligerently as the women of England have, in late years, besieged Parliament.  The Senate had thought fit to save money for the second Punic War by curtailing all extravagance in dress; and, when the war was over, showed no disposition to repeal a statute which—­to the simple masculine mind—­seemed productive of nothing but good.  Therefore the women gathered in the streets of Rome, demanding the restitution of their ornaments, and deeply scandalizing poor Cato, who could hardly wedge his way through the crowd.  His views on this occasion were expressed with the bewildered bitterness of a modern British conservative.  He sighed for the good old days when women were under the strict control of their fathers and husbands, and he very plainly told the Senators that if they had maintained their proper authority at home, their wives and daughters would not then be misbehaving themselves in public.  “It was not without painful emotions of shame,” said this outraged Roman gentleman, “that I just now made my way to the Forum through a herd of women.  Our ancestors thought it improper that women should transact any private business without a director.  We, it seems, suffer them to interfere in the management of state affairs, and to intrude into the general assemblies.  Had I not been restrained by the modesty and dignity of some among them, had I not been unwilling that they should be rebuked by a Consul, I should have said to them:  ’What sort of practice is this of running into the streets, and addressing other women’s husbands?  Could you not have petitioned at home?  Are your blandishments more seductive in public than in private, and with other husbands than your own?’”

How natural it all sounds, how modern, how familiar!  And with what knowledge of the immutable laws of nature, as opposed to the capricious laws of man, did Lucius Valerius defend the rebellious women of Rome!  “Elegance of apparel,” he pleaded before the Senate, “and jewels, and ornaments,—­these are a woman’s badges of distinction; in these she glories and delights; these our ancestors called the woman’s world.  What else does she lay aside in mourning save her purple and gold?  What else does she resume when the mourning is over?  How does she manifest her sympathy on occasions of public rejoicing, but by adding to the splendour of her dress?"[1]

[Footnote 1:  Livy.]

Of course the statute was repealed.  The only sumptuary laws which defied resistance were those which draped the Venetian gondolas and the Milanese priests in black, and with such restrictions women had no concern.