That “popular enthusiasm is but a fire of straw” has been amply demonstrated by all who have tried to keep it going.  It can be lighted to some purpose, as when money is extracted from the enthusiasts before they have had time to cool; but even this process—­so skilfully conducted by the initiated—­seems unworthy of great and noble charities, or of great and noble causes.  It is true also that the agitator—­no matter what he may be agitating—­is always sure of his market; a circumstance which made that most conservative of chancellors, Lord Eldon, swear with bitter oaths that, if he were to begin life over again, he would begin it as an agitator.  Tom Moore tells a pleasant story (one of the many pleasant stories embalmed in his vast sarcophagus of a diary) about a street orator whom he heard address a crowd in Dublin.  The man’s eloquence was so stirring that Moore was ravished by it, and he expressed to Sheil his admiration for the speaker.  “Ah,” said Sheil carelessly, “that was a brewer’s patriot.  Most of the great brewers have in their employ a regular patriot who goes about among the publicans, talking violent politics, which helps to sell the beer.”

Honest enthusiasm, we are often told, is the power which moves the world.  Therefore it is perhaps that honest enthusiasts seem to think that if they stopped pushing, the world would stop moving,—­as though it were a new world which didn’t know its way.  This belief inclines them to intolerance.  The more keen they are, the more contemptuous they become.  What Wordsworth admirably called “the self-applauding sincerity of a heated mind” leaves them no loophole for doubt, and no understanding of the doubter.  In their volcanic progress they bowl over the non-partisan—­a man and a brother—­with splendid unconcern.  He, poor soul, stunned but not convinced, clings desperately to some pettifogging convictions which he calls truth, and refuses a clearer vision.  His habit of remembering what he believed yesterday clogs his mind, and makes it hard for him to believe something entirely new to-day.  Much has been said about the inconvenience of keeping opinions, but much might be said about the serenity of the process.  Old opinions are like old friends,—­we cease to question their worth because, after years of intimacy and the loss of some valuable illusions, we have grown to place our slow reliance on them.  We know at least where we stand, and whither we are tending, and we refuse to bustle feverishly about the circumference of life, because, as Amiel warns us, we cannot reach its core.

The Temptation of Eve

“My Love in her attire doth shew her wit.”

It is an old and honoured jest that Eve—­type of eternal womanhood—­sacrificed the peace of Eden for the pleasures of dress.  We see this jest reflected in the satire of the Middle Ages, in the bitter gibes of mummer and buffoon.  We can hear its echoes in the invectives of the reformer,—­“I doubt,” said a good fifteenth-century bishop to the ladies of England in their horned caps,—­“I doubt the Devil sit not between those horns.”  We find it illustrated with admirable naivete in the tapestries which hang in the entrance corridor of the Belle Arti in Florence.