Wide reading Scott’s first qualification—­Scott the antiquary—­Character of his interest in history—­His imagination—­His knowledge of practical affairs—­Common-sense in criticism—­Cheerfulness, good-humor, and optimism—­General aspect of Scott’s critical work.

Wide and appreciative reading was Scott’s first qualification for critical work.  A memory that retained an incredible amount of what he read was the second.  One of the severest censures he ever expressed was in regard to Godwin, who, he thought, undertook to do scholarly work without adequate equipment.  “We would advise him,” Scott said in his review of Godwin’s Life of Chaucer, “in future to read before he writes, and not merely while he is writing.”  Scott himself had accumulated a store of literary materials, and he used them according to the dictates of a temperament which had vivid interests on many sides.

We may distinguish three points of view which were habitual to Scott, and which determined the direction of his creative work, as well as the tone of his criticism.  These were—­as all the world knows—­the historical, the romantic, the practical.

He was, as he often chose to call himself, an antiquary; he felt the appeal of all that was old and curious.  But he was much more than that.  The typical antiquary has his mind so thoroughly devoted to the past that the present seems remote to him.  The sheer intellectual capacity of such a man as Scott might be enough to save him from such a limitation, for he could give to the past as much attention as an ordinary man could muster, and still have interest for contemporary affairs; but his capacity was not all that saved Scott.  He viewed the past always as filled with living men, whose chief occupation was to think and feel rather than to provide towers and armor for the delectation of future antiquaries.[7] A sympathetic student of his work has said, “There is ... throughout the poetry of this author, even when he leads us to the remotest wildernesses and the most desolate monuments of antiquity, a constant reference to the feelings of man in his social condition."[8] The past, to the author of Kenilworth, was only the far end of the present, and he believed that the most useful result of the study of history is a comprehension of the real quality of one’s own period and a wisdom in the conduct of present day affairs.[9]

The favorite pursuits of Scott’s youth indicate that his characteristic taste showed itself early; indeed it is said that he retained his boyish traits more completely than most people do.  We can trace much of his love of the past to the family traditions which made the adventurous life of his ancestors vividly real to him.  The annals of the Scotts were his earliest study, and he developed such an affection for his freebooting grandsires that in his manhood he confessed to an unconquerable liking for the robbers and captains of banditti of his romances, characters