the third order, three cells by three; and Frenicle published in 1693 diagrams of all the arrangements of the fourth order—­880 in number—­and his results have been verified over and over again.  I may here refer to the general solution for this order, for numbers not necessarily consecutive, by E. Bergholt in Nature, May 26, 1910, as it is of the greatest importance to students of this subject.  The enumeration of the examples of any higher order is a completely unsolved problem.

As to classification, it is largely a matter of individual taste—­perhaps an aesthetic question, for there is beauty in the law and order of numbers.  A man once said that he divided the human race into two great classes:  those who take snuff and those who do not.  I am not sure that some of our classifications of magic squares are not almost as valueless.  However, lovers of these things seem somewhat agreed that Nasik magic squares (so named by Mr. Frost, a student of them, after the town in India where he lived, and also called Diabolique and Pandiagonal) and Associated magic squares are of special interest, so I will just explain what these are for the benefit of the novice.

[Illustration:  SIMPLE]

[Illustration:  SEMI-NASIK]

[Illustration:  ASSOCIATED]

[Illustration:  NASIK]

I published in The Queen for January 15, 1910, an article that would enable the reader to write out, if he so desired, all the 880 magics of the fourth order, and the following is the complete classification that I gave.  The first example is that of a Simple square that fulfils the simple conditions and no more.  The second example is a Semi-Nasik, which has the additional property that the opposite short diagonals of two cells each together sum to 34.  Thus, 14 + 4 + 11 + 5 = 34 and 12 + 6 + 13 + 3 = 34.  The third example is not only Semi-Nasik but also Associated, because in it every number, if added to the number that is equidistant, in a straight line, from the centre gives 17.  Thus, 1 + 16, 2 + 15, 3 + 14, etc.  The fourth example, considered the most “perfect” of all, is a Nasik.  Here all the broken diagonals sum to 34.  Thus, for example, 15 + 14 + 2 + 3, and 10 + 4 + 7 + 13, and 15 + 5 + 2 + 12.  As a consequence, its properties are such that if you repeat the square in all directions you may mark off a square, 4 x 4, wherever you please, and it will be magic.

The following table not only gives a complete enumeration under the four forms described, but also a classification under the twelve graphic types indicated in the diagrams.  The dots at the end of each line represent the relative positions of those complementary pairs, 1 + 16, 2 + 15, etc., which sum to 17.  For example, it will be seen that the first and second magic squares given are of Type VI., that the third square is of Type III., and that the fourth is of Type I. Edouard Lucas indicated these types, but he dropped exactly half of them and did not attempt the classification.