of battle and sailing.’ Many years later
in a note upon the battle which Codrington dictated
to his daughter, Lady Bourchier, he says that on the
20th, in spite of Collingwood’s advice to attack
at once, Nelson ’continued waiting upon them
in two columns according to the order of sailing and
the memorable written instruction which was given
out to all the captains.’[23] Later still, when
a veteran of seventy-six years, he gave to Sir Harris
Nicolas another note which shows how in his own mind
he reconciled the apparent discrepancy between the
dual and the triple organisation. It runs as follows:
’In Lord Nelson’s memorandum of October
9, 1805, he refers to “an advanced squadron
of eight of the fastest sailing two-decked ships”
to be added to either of the two lines of the order
of sailing as may be required; and says that this
advanced squadron would probably have to cut through
“two, three or four ships of the enemy’s
centre so as to ensure getting at their commander-in-chief,
on whom every effort must be made to capture";[24]
and he afterwards twice speaks of the enemy’s
van coming to succour their rear. Now I am under
the impression that I was expressly instructed by
Lord Nelson (referring to the probability of the enemy’s
van coming down upon us), being in the Orion, one
of the eight ships named, that he himself would probably
make a feint of attacking their van in order to prevent
or retard it.’ Here then would seem to
be still further confusion, due to a failure to distinguish
between the leeward and windward form of attack.
According to this statement Codrington believed the
advanced squadron was in either case to attack the
centre, while Nelson with his division contained the
van. But curiously enough in a similar note,
printed by Lady Bourchier on Nicolas’s authority,
there is a difference in the wording which, though
difficult to account for, seems to give the truer
version of what Codrington really said. It is
there stated that Codrington told Nicolas he was strongly
impressed with the belief ’that Lord Nelson
directed eight of the smaller and handier ships, of
which the Orion was one, to be ready to haul out of
the line in case the enemy’s van should appear
to go down to the assistance of the ships engaged
to meet and resist them: that to prevent this
manoeuvre on the part of the enemy Lord Nelson intimated
his intention of making a feint of hauling out towards
their van,’ &c. There is little doubt that
we have here the true distribution of duties which
Nelson intended for the windward attack—that
is, the advanced squadron was to be the real containing
force, but he intended to assist it by himself making
a feint on the enemy’s van before delivering
his true attack on the centre.[25]